Tag: Donald Trump

  • Trump-Coin: May 22nd brings the mega bullrun or mega crash

    Trump-Coin: May 22nd brings the mega bullrun or mega crash



    • The Trump coin can trigger a massive run on May 22nd after Trump’s appearance-or a massive sale.
    • Despite the initial profits for the top walls, over 764,000 Trump token owners are now in the minus in view of the growing political counter reaction.

    The Trump coin is once again under intensive market observation. The course of the memoin is $ 11 and, after the recent turbulence, has settled down just above its sliding 50-day average of $ 10.50.

    As CNF reported, a gala dinner on May 22nd in the White House can determine the further path of the Memecoin for the top owners. Investors weigh the chance of a 10-fold rally against the risk of a crash.

    Gala hype heats speculations while critics express ethical concerns

    Trump-Coin rose to over $ 16 at the end of April after President Trump announced that the 220 largest investment in the White House would be invited to dinner. As CNF reported, this triggered a widespread Fomo and a short -term rally that later reversed. The announcement also caused criticism from Congress MPs.

    Senator Jon Ossoff accused the President that he sells “access” by binding coins to a high -ranking political event – a reproach that could have far -reaching consequences. Senator Elizabeth Warren also renewed her criticism of the Trump family’s participation in cryptocurrencies and aimed at her StableCoin project USD1 under World Liberty Financial.

    Despite the counter reaction, May 22nd is an appointment and turns out to be a critical date. Market observers suspect that media attention could trigger another rally if Trump is personally present or expresses itself politically. The Trump coin had already reached $ 70 in January, so a strong increase is theoretically possible when demand increases.

    Most owners have to accept losses

    The blockchain data show a familiar pattern in the cycles of the meme coins. Report According to only 58 Wallets have substantial profits with the Trump coin-in the millions. These wallets acquired the tokens at the market launch and sold them in the high phase. In contrast, over 764,000 wallets are now in the minus after buying during the rally.

    This discrepancy has caused a lot of trouble in the crypto community. The centralized nature of the project gives rise to great concern. CIC Digital LLC and Fight Fight Fight LLC – both connected to Trump – hold 80% of the offer, although the coins are closed for three years.

    Although Trump described himself as a “crypto president” and, together with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, leads the new Doge (Department of Government Efficiency), the skepticism remains great.

    Volatility expected because both economic and political pressure work

    The Trump coin is also under general market pressure. As CNF reported, Trump announced a “earth -shattering” announcement to X, which fueled speculation that she could relate to cryptopolitics. However, others believe that they could be non -related national issues. The time of the announcement, shortly before dinner on May 22, contributes to helplessness.

    In the meantime, the dealers are waiting for economic signals. The upcoming meeting of the Federal Reserve could put new pressure on risk systems. Inflation worries and hesitant politics create an unfavorable environment for speculative crypto projects such as Trump.

    Analysts warn that the gala could become a “Sell the News” event. If Trump is not present or no important announcements are made, investors could rush out. The first coin launch in January showed how quickly the hype can subside. There is a lot at stake, because Trump’s assessment exceeds $ 31 billion in full dilution.

    As CNF reported, the “Trump” brand used to use digital assets-from NFTS, for example-but the political overlap of this coins canceled it from others. With 200 million tokens in circulation and an offer target of 1 billion over three years, market dynamics could change quickly.

  • George Clooney’s lawyer spouse Amal might face US ban underneath newly proposed Trump sanctions



    George Clooney’s spouse Amal might face a US ban following Donald Trump’s sanctions on the Worldwide Legal Court docket (ICC).

    Final Might, the British human rights lawyer – who has represented a number of high-profile shoppers – served on an professional panel put collectively by Worldwide Legal Court docket (ICC) Prosecutor Karim Khan to judge proof of battle crimes and crimes in opposition to humanity within the Israel-Hamas battle.

    The panel ‘unanimously’ concluded that there have been cheap grounds to pursue expenses and arrest warrants in opposition to each Hamas leaders and Israeli officers, together with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

    “We unanimously conclude that there are cheap grounds to consider that Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif and Ismail Haniyeh have dedicated battle crimes and crimes in opposition to humanity, together with hostage-taking, homicide and crimes of sexual violence,” Clooney wrote of the choice.

    

    Whereas we do not know the extent of Clooney’s involvement within the case, President Trump stated in an government order on 6 February that he could be imposing sanctions on the ICC for issuing warrant on Netanyahu and Gallant.

    The 78-year-old stated the ICC, ‘and not using a authentic foundation, asserted jurisdiction over and opened preliminary investigations regarding personnel of the US and sure of its allies, together with Israel’.

    ICC official Khan was named within the government order, while Clooney was not.

    Nonetheless, the Monetary Occasions has reported that the UK international workplace has warned senior British attorneys are vulnerable to being sanctioned by the US.

    George Clooney and Amal Clooney received married in 2014 (Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Photos)

    They report that ‘individuals accustomed to the matter’ have stated that ‘a number of senior attorneys concerned within the ICC’s battle crimes case’ have acquired warnings.

    It’s but to be confirmed whether or not Clooney was contacted, because the extent of her help as a ICC panelist stays unclear.

    The supposed sanctions embody a attainable journey ban to the US and the freezing of belongings.

    “The ICC has no jurisdiction over the US or Israel, as neither nation is get together to the Rome Statute or a member of the ICC,” the order learn.

    “Neither nation has ever recognised the ICC’s jurisdiction, and each nations are thriving democracies with militaries that strictly adhere to the legal guidelines of battle.

    Amal Clooney might face a US ban following Donald Trump’s sanctions on the Worldwide Legal Court docket (Taylor Hill/FilmMagic)

    “The ICC’s latest actions in opposition to Israel and the US set a harmful precedent, straight endangering present and former United States personnel, together with energetic service members of the Armed Forces, by exposing them to harassment, abuse, and attainable arrest.

    “This malign conduct in flip threatens to infringe upon the sovereignty of the US and undermines the crucial nationwide safety and international coverage work of the US Authorities and our allies, together with Israel.”

    Clooney has but commented on the scenario.

    LADbible Group has contacted the UK international workplace, and George and Amal Clooney’s representatives for remark.

  • Donald Trump responds with reply everybody would count on when requested ‘who must be subsequent pope’



    If the Cardinals of the Catholic Church want some assist shortlisting individuals to turn into the following Pope, Donald Trump has acquired some concepts.

    The US President, 78, has revealed who his ‘primary alternative’ to exchange the late Pope Francis is – and also you in all probability will not be that shocked by his reply.

    He reckons he is aware of the right candidate to step into the massive footwear that the 88-year-old pontiff has left to fill following his dying on Easter Monday (21 April).

    Pope Francis, whose actual title was Jorge Mario Bergolio, sadly handed away after struggling a cerebral stroke that led to a coma and irreversible coronary heart failure.

    He was hailed because the ‘Individuals’s Pope’ by Catholics world wide, whereas Sir Keir Starmer described him as a pontiff for ‘the poor, the downtrodden and the forgotten’ in wake of his passing.

    Evidently, Bergolio’s successor has a difficult legacy to dwell as much as.

    Donald Trump, pictured with Pope Francis in 2017, reckons he is aware of the best candidate to guide the Catholic Church (ALESSANDRA TARANTINO/POOL/AFP through Getty Pictures)

    Over 100 cardinals will meet within the Sistine Chapel on 7 Might to kickstart the secretive election course of to decide on the following chief of the Catholic Church.

    However not simply anybody can turn into the brand new Pope; there are a string of strict necessities that candidates should meet earlier than they are often thought of.

    Formal situations embrace being baptised by the Catholic Church, being single, and being male, which is all the way down to the truth that solely males might be ordained as clergymen and bishops.

    You additionally have to be no less than 35 years outdated and have studied the Bible, theology, or canon regulation.

    Nonetheless, regardless of figuring out as a non-denominational Christian (a type of Protestantism), Trump reckons he’d be the right man for the job.

    Yep, you learn that proper.

    When a reporter requested who he want to take Pope Francis’ place, the President beneficial himself.

    “I might wish to be Pope,” the commander-in-chief mentioned. “That’d be my primary alternative.”

    The President and Melania seen attending the pontiff’s funeral final weekend (Marco Ravagli/Future Publishing through Getty Pictures)

    Now, everyone knows that Trump holds himself in excessive esteem, however placing himself on the identical pedestal as His Holiness is significantly taking the biscuit.

    Additionally, and maybe fairly importantly, Trump is not even Catholic. Would in all probability be higher if the brand new head of the Catholic Church was truly Catholic, however hey, what do I do know?

    He went on to say that he did not have a particular desire over who’s chosen, however he did counsel a US pope would not be a foul concept.

    “I need to say, now we have a cardinal that occurs to be out of a spot referred to as New York who’s superb, so we’ll see what occurs,” Trump added.

    South Carolina senator and distinguished Republican Lindsey Graham appeared all for the concept of Trump heading up the Catholic Church, saying in a social media submit that he can be a ‘darkish horse candidate’.

    In a submit on X, he wrote: “I used to be excited to listen to that President Trump is open to the concept of being the following Pope.

    “This would actually be a darkish horse candidate, however I’d ask the papal conclave and Catholic devoted to maintain an open thoughts about this risk!

    “The primary Pope-U.S. President mixture has many upsides. Waiting for white smoke…. Trump MMXXVIII!”

    Trump’s presence at Pope Francis’ funeral wasn’t with out incident, because the President triggered a stir together with his alternative of clothes in addition to speaking store with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy forward of the service.

  • All the foundations you need to observe on board Elon Musk’s personal jet



    Elon Musk’s strict personal jet guidelines have been leaked, and the billionaire’s curious character is as soon as once more being questioned.

    It has been a tricky few monetary months for the world’s richest man, with Donald Trump’s tariffs sparking bother in paradise because the X proprietor was simply considered one of a number of billionaires to be hit laborious by the brand new guidelines.

    The 53-year-old even hit out on the Trump adviser behind the concept, which has solely seemingly solely bought worse with time, because the commerce conflict with China continues.

    

    Ever since Musk was appointed as a senior adviser to the president, Tesla gross sales have been slumping worldwide, to the extent the place he misplaced round $41 billion. Maybe they are going to choose up once more when he’s compelled to depart his place as a particular authorities worker.

    Trump is undoubtedly a daily visitor on Musk’s personal jet, however even the world’s strongest man may be topic to a number of the reported guidelines the proprietor enforces.

    Inside Musk’s personal jet (YouTube)

    Following a cyber assault on NetJets, a doc was leaked which revealed the entire personal jet etiquette Musk needs everybody to observe when onboard his favorite jet (sure, he has two), the Gulfstream G650ER.

    The personal jet seats simply 18, which implies if he needs to have all his children (14) and their moms (4) on board, then one unfortunate soul goes to should miss out. You get the sensation that he’d most likely not invite Vivian Jenna Wilson, on condition that she’s beforehand described him as a ‘pathetic man baby’ who she hasn’t spoken to since 2020.

    The doc (by way of Bloomberg) stated: “Mr. Musk considers himself self-sufficient and doesn’t need assistance with know-how—if he does, he’ll ask.”

    So, rule primary, don’t ask if he wants assist fixing the wifi.

    If you happen to prefer to maintain your air vents going if you’re on a airplane, then do not hassle getting on Musk’s jet, he does not just like the noise. However don’t be concerned, the cabin might be stored at round 18 levels celsius.

    There’s clearly a lot to speak with the billionaire about, whether or not or not it’s his plans for area or his right-wing opinions on X, however small speak will not be inspired. Musk ‘needs to fly as shortly and instantly’ as doable and is ‘not keen on conserving gasoline’, the doc states.

    Musk and Trump (Brandon Bell/Getty Pictures)

    Simply in case you have been tempted to start out up a dialog, it must be famous that Musk will probably be asleep, as he likes his lights dimmed.

    On condition that he has taken his jet on journeys that will reportedly take simply 10 minutes within the automotive previously, his potential to nap so effectively have to be counseled. His perspective in direction of the planet, not a lot.

    LADbible group has contacted Elon Musk’s representatives and NetJets for remark.

  • John Roberts Often Defers to Trump—but Not on the White House Ballroom Project

    John Roberts Often Defers to Trump—but Not on the White House Ballroom Project

    Chief Justice John Roberts broke with Donald Trump and the Supreme Court’s other conservative justices on Monday, objecting to the president’s plan to build a massive ballroom at the White House.

    “The White House is not just any building.”

    Roberts has often deferred to Trump’s executive authority, but his dissent marked a rare break from a president whose policies have dominated the court’s docket. Roberts has authored major opinions supporting Trump, including the 2024 ruling granting him immunity from criminal prosecution and last June’s decision allowing him to fire the heads of independent agencies.

    Even in dissent, Roberts used the historically minded rhetoric for which he is known. His six-page statement invoked the history and architecture of Washington, quoting Theodore Roosevelt and Winston Churchill on the importance of iconic public buildings.

    “‘We shape our buildings, and afterwards our buildings shape us,’” Roberts wrote, lifting a line from a 1943 Churchill war speech.

    He added, “All the more reason to ensure that those responsible follow the rules in deciding what to tear down and what to build up at the People’s House.”

    Roberts invokes the White House’s historic role

    Roberts, who often tells audiences that he once planned to pursue a history Ph.D. rather than a law degree at Harvard, highlighted the symbolism of Washington’s historic architecture.

    He noted that when Roosevelt thanked Congress in 1902 for funding additions to the East and West wings, the president referred to “the stately simplicity” of the original architecture and the importance of preserving “such buildings as historic monuments which keep alive our sense of continuing with the Nation’s past.”

    Throughout his opinion, Roberts showed his own appreciation for the White House’s architecture, much as he has expressed pride in the Supreme Court’s columned building. The Supreme Court did not have its own building until 1935, more than a century after the White House and US Capitol were constructed.

    Roberts’ position did not affect the outcome and came at no apparent cost to Trump. His five conservative colleagues formed a majority that allowed construction of the ballroom to continue. The project has been underway for nearly a year and is nearing completion.

    Still, Monday’s statement adds another dimension to Roberts’ record as chief justice during Trump’s aggressive second-term agenda. The president’s cases have shaped the court’s work and will form a significant part of Roberts’ legacy.

    Roberts has approved many Trump policies, but last session he voted against two of the president’s most far-reaching initiatives: sweeping tariffs on foreign goods imposed without congressional approval and an effort to restrict birthright citizenship, the long-standing practice granting US citizenship to children born in the country.

    Trump’s plans to reshape Washington

    The case’s focus on American history also underscored Roberts’ role as chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution. The position is largely ceremonial because he serves as chief justice, but Roberts has presided over Smithsonian board meetings and observed the Trump administration’s continuing effort to reshape the nation’s leading public museums.

    Trump’s campaign to transform Washington in his own image has included adding his name to the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and proposing a 250-foot triumphal arch. The arch is planned for the traffic circle between the entrance to Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial.

    The lawsuit was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The organization argued that demolishing the East Wing and constructing a 90,000 square-foot ballroom and security structure required congressional approval.

    Lower federal courts initially sided with the Trust and allowed the case to proceed. The judges found that the organization had “standing” to sue because it had shown a significant injury. The Trust cited Alison Hoagland, a longtime Trust leader and member and an architectural historian, who said the project had harmed her enjoyment of the White House.

    The Supreme Court’s majority rejected that reasoning, writing that “mere offense, disagreement, or distaste does not qualify as a concrete and particularized injury” for purposes of bringing a lawsuit. The majority issued its ruling per curiam, Latin for “by the court,” as is common in appeals arriving through the court’s emergency docket. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett did not sign separate opinions.

    Roberts disagreed that Hoagland’s claim was minor. Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined his opinion.

    “The White House is not just any building, and – when it comes to historic preservation – Hoagland is not just any person.”

    Roberts said earlier court decisions had recognized injury based on “esthetic interests.” He cited a 1992 precedent in which, as Roberts described it, “a desire to … observe an animal species like a particular crocodile, even for purely esthetic purposes was undeniably a cognizable interest for purposes of standing.”

    Roberts says ballroom project is likely unlawful

    In the case before the court, Roberts declared, “A historic preservationist such as Hoagland can be aesthetically injured in a concrete, particularized way by the transformation of a historic building that she frequently enjoys, just as an environmentalist can sustain a concrete, particularized aesthetic injury from the extinction of a particular animal or the transformation of a particular forest or river that he regularly enjoys.”

    Monday’s ruling addressed only the question of standing. The majority said it was not deciding whether the ballroom project itself was lawful. Roberts, however, made clear that he viewed the broader construction effort skeptically.

    He wrote that Congress had expressly prohibited construction on such federal property “without express authority of Congress.”

    “That construction is likely unlawful,” he said, adding that the usual appropriation for White House maintenance “likely does not authorize the President to use hundreds of millions of dollars in private donations to tear down the East Wing and construct a ballroom in its stead.”

  • Iran Retaliates After US Strikes, Defying Trump’s Warning It Could Be Hit ‘Much Harder’

    Iran Retaliates After US Strikes, Defying Trump’s Warning It Could Be Hit ‘Much Harder’

    The US military carried out additional strikes on Iran on Tuesday, prompting Tehran to launch attacks toward Jordan, Bahrain and Kuwait despite President Donald Trump’s warning that Iran would be “hit much harder” if it retaliated.

    The latest exchange followed overnight US-Iranian attacks into Monday, the first direct strikes between the two countries in more than a month. The escalation risked reigniting a damaging conflict after weeks of relative military calm.

    After the new US strikes were announced, Trump warned that Iran would face more severe military action if it retaliated against what he called a “very justified attack.”

    “They will be hit again at a much harder and higher level, but it will not be the biggest attack of them all, that is waiting in the wings and, when it is over, there will be very little left of the Islamic Republic of Iran!” he wrote Tuesday on Truth Social.

    Iran vowed a “crushing” response and launched ballistic missiles toward Jordan and drones toward Bahrain and Kuwait, saying it was targeting US military assets.

    Tehran also claimed that shrapnel from one of the US strikes hit a wedding celebration in southern Iran, killing at least four people, including a toddler.

    In a statement to CNN, a US military spokesperson said US Central Command (CENTCOM) had seen reports of the claim and denied targeting civilians in Iran.

    “We are aware of reports, which originated from Iranian state media. The U.S. military never targets civilians, unlike the IRGC,” Capt. Timothy Hawkins, a CENTCOM spokesperson, said Wednesday, referring to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

    US strikes target IRGC facilities

    CENTCOM said the US strikes were carried out in response to recent attempted Iranian attacks “against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and American troops deployed to the region,” according to a post on X.

    Since the US strikes on Sunday, two tankers have been hit by projectiles, according to maritime intelligence group Marisks and the traffic monitoring agency United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO). Iran and the US remain engaged in a protracted confrontation over the narrow waterway, which is critical to global energy supplies.

    CENTCOM said Tuesday’s strikes targeted “air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets and facilities, mine laying capabilities, and communications sites” associated with the IRGC. The strikes began at 12 p.m. ET, and CENTCOM announced they were complete more than six hours later.

    The renewed fighting came despite Trump’s earlier indication that he planned to move away from a military campaign and focus instead on increasing economic pressure on Iran.

    “I’m not trying to force Iran to the bargaining table,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday night, after Iran retaliated. “I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing.”

    Oil futures climbed above $94 a barrel after the US announced the new strikes.

    Iran launches attacks toward regional allies

    Jordan said it intercepted 10 Iranian missiles, while three others landed in remote areas far from populated locations. No casualties were reported, according to Jordan’s military.

    Kuwait and Bahrain said they activated air defense systems to intercept Iranian drones. Tehran also claimed to have launched a combined missile and drone attack on Erbil in Iraq’s autonomous Kurdistan region.

    Iran’s attacks came as Pakistan’s officials said they were “not discouraged” by the increase in violence. Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry “remains engaged” with Tehran and Washington, spokesperson Tahir Andrabi told reporters Wednesday. He said the strikes “should not be termed as a failure of the mediatory process.”

    Reports of casualties and damage in Iran

    The US attacks struck multiple locations across Iran.

    Seven people were killed in strikes on Khuzestan province, which borders Iraq, Iran’s state-run Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported, citing a regional official.

    The Iranian port cities of Chabahar and Konarak on the Gulf of Oman, which host major commercial, maritime and military infrastructure, also came under attack. Explosions were heard east of Bandar Abbas and around Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, according to state-linked media.

    Iran’s state-run Press TV reported that the strikes also hit Jiroft Airport in southeastern Iran and a fishmeal factory on Qeshm Island.

    Separately, an explosion was heard in Asaluyeh, a key gas and petrochemical hub on Iran’s Persian Gulf coast, according to the semi-official Fars News Agency.

    Iranian authorities claimed that several people, including a 4-year-old child, were killed and at least 68 others wounded when shrapnel fell on a building hosting a wedding celebration in the coastal village of Kouhestak in southern Iran’s Sirik county, Press TV reported.

    Footage released by Iran’s semi-official Tasnim News Agency, which purportedly showed the aftermath of a US strike, showed heavy smoke above rubble as people shouted. CNN geolocated the footage to a residential neighborhood in Kouhestak but said it could not independently verify the details of the alleged strike.

    Video also showed that a large communications tower in Kouhestak was badly damaged Tuesday night. The tower was about 135 meters (442 feet) from the building where the wedding reception was held.

    At least 19 of the wounded were children under 10, including seven boys and 12 girls, the Iranian Students’ News Agency quoted a regional health official as saying.

    Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei condemned the attack as part of a “catalogue of atrocities” committed by the US and criticized the global community’s “normalization of bombing.” In a post on X on Wednesday, Baghaei also denounced CENTCOM’s denial of targeting civilians in Iran, calling the strike a “brutal war crime.”

    The alleged attack received extensive coverage in Iranian state media and prompted outrage on Iranian social media, followed by the rapid publication of a Lego-style animated video, a format that has become a recurring feature of Iranian wartime propaganda.

    Kouhestak is about 37 kilometers (22 miles) from Minab, where Iran says a US strike hit an elementary school in February, killing at least 168 children and 14 teachers.

    Struggle over the Strait of Hormuz

    The fighting resumed as the US and Iran remained locked in a dispute over the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran claims the right to control the waterway, while Washington says it is an international waterway.

    The strait has been a chokepoint for global energy supplies since the war began, although more oil has flowed through it in recent weeks.

    The US said it launched strikes on Sunday because Iran was attempting to use rockets to lay new sea mines in the strait. Tehran responded by firing at what it described as US military targets in the Middle East.

    Trump told Fox News on Tuesday that the US had notified Arab allies in the Persian Gulf before the latest strikes. He also criticized Iran’s leadership, saying: “I think an agreement with them isn’t worth the paper it’s written on,” before adding: “They don’t stop: They’re crazy, and they’re stupid.”

    Trump told Fox News that the US targeted radar systems Iran had attempted to rebuild. “They tried to rebuild their radar because they can’t see anything,” he said. “We waited until it was almost built, and then we hit it.”

    The Trump administration has repeatedly dismissed concerns about Iran’s long-term control of the strait.

    “In two years, the Strait of Hormuz will be like a worthless piece of water — the oil will be going on pipelines across land,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Larry Kudlow on Tuesday during an interview at a Group of 20 meeting. He was referring to plans by Arab states in the gulf to build infrastructure that would bypass the strait.

    Bessent also said the Treasury Department’s efforts to isolate Iran’s economy from the rest of the world would eventually force the regime to surrender, describing his role as helping to “make sure that they want to have a deal.”

    “We are going to economically asphyxiate this regime,” Bessent said. “The world is tired of this pariah state, or this rogue state, and they are willing to make it a pariah.”

    He added that after initially targeting a bank in Dubai over its alleged ties to Iran, the Treasury Department was likely to sanction two more banks in the next couple of weeks.

  • Democrats Eye New Tool to Hold Trump Accountable if They Win House

    Democrats Eye New Tool to Hold Trump Accountable if They Win House

    Democrats Prepare Sweeping Investigations and Legal Battles Ahead of Midterms

    With two months until the midterm elections, Democrats are laying the groundwork to launch far-reaching investigations into the Trump administration and preparing for high-stakes court battles if they win control of the House of Representatives in November.

    Top Investigative Targets: Iran, Ballroom, Business Dealings, Epstein Files

    President Donald Trump’s war with Iran, his White House ballroom project, his family’s business dealings, and the administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files will be among the top targets of investigations if Democrats take back the House, according to conversations with over a dozen Democratic lawmakers and aides.

    Democrats don’t want to squander the opportunity to act as a check on Trump if they reclaim the majority and say they have learned a lot since the last time the party controlled the House while Trump was in office. Few say they are interested in launching an impeachment process on day one, and many instead are eyeing a new tool that would be at their disposal to try to quickly compel the testimony and documents they seek: lawsuits.

    Legal Standing and the Power to Sue

    In the majority, Democrats would have the ability to sue the Trump administration in a more effective way since they have not had standing to do so in the minority. Whether it is compelling testimony from a top administration official, escalating a fight over obtaining documents, or trying to halt the construction of Trump’s White House ballroom, Democrats plan to be strategic and aggressive about taking their fight to court.

    “We’re going to use every tool in the toolbox and we will have certainly a lot more authority to get ourselves into court in the majority than we did when we were in the minority,”

    Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who is in line to lead the powerful House Judiciary Committee, told CNN.

    “We are not taking no for an answer in terms of getting the evidence we need,”

    Raskin said.

    Committee Leaders Outline Specific Probes

    Raskin has already launched investigations into allegations of corrupt government contract deals at Donald Trump Jr.’s venture capital firm and on the Trump administration’s pardon policy. Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, wants to interview the president and first lady as well as top officials like Vice President JD Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles about how the administration has handled the Epstein matter. Garcia also wants to interview Kushner and Trump family members about their business dealings.

    Democratic Rep. Adam Smith plans to probe the Trump administration’s decision to go to war with Iran and US strikes on alleged drug boats atop the House Armed Services Committee. Democratic Rep. Jared Huffman is laying the groundwork to investigate Trump’s ballroom and other construction projects on the House Natural Resources panel.

    Even in the minority on the House Homeland Security Committee, Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson has tried to get answers on the administration’s deportation efforts and the practices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. And that’s without committee gavels, subpoena power, and the standing to sue in court — all of which House Democrats will gain if they win the majority.

    Aggressive Planning and Staffing for Oversight

    For now, lawmakers in line to run committees are working aggressively to outline their top investigative priorities, jockeying for who will investigate what and trying to coordinate an overarching plan on ambitious investigative targets.

    Democratic leadership and committee teams are preparing to launch an aggressive hiring push if they win in November to be ready for the onslaught of investigations they have planned. One of the most important roles will be who Democrats select to be their in-house general counsel, who will help Democrats navigate lawsuits and the courts.

    “If you’re a highly qualified, experienced lawyer or senior staffer out there that wants to be part of this historic moment of accountability think about coming back to the Capitol and being part of this team because we will be staffing up,”

    Huffman told CNN.

    Democrats have laid the groundwork through the creation of a legal task force, which has already racked up wins even with the party in the minority, including successfully stopping the Trump administration from blocking lawmakers from making announced oversight visits to federal immigration detention facilities.

    “Should Democrats get the gavel in either chamber, we expect sustained oversight across a sweeping range of issues and entities. Companies and institutions should use the time they have now to prepare for that scrutiny,”

    said Emily Loeb, a partner at the law firm Jenner & Block, whose team has already been contacted by companies preparing for congressional investigations.

    Court Challenges and Alternative Strategies

    Of course, there’s no guarantee of success in the courts. But Democrats say they are not deterred by that, including a recent decision by the Supreme Court that cleared the way for Trump to continue construction of his massive new ballroom project at the White House, concluding that a preservation group lacked the legal right — known as standing — to challenge the project.

    “Donald Trump will not be able to run out the clock on these illegal construction projects because his buddies on the Supreme Court bounced a case for lack of standing,”

    Huffman said.

    But bringing an issue to court would just be one option at the party’s disposal.

    Anticipating roadblocks from the Trump administration, Democrats also plan to rely heavily on requests for information from the private sector, which they say would not be beholden to the same executive privilege restrictions Trump may invoke on government officials asked to comply with congressional requests or subpoenas.

    And Democrats say they have already developed relationships with multiple whistleblowers both inside and outside the government who they would also rely on in the majority if they can’t get the answers they seek directly from Trump administration officials.

    Introducing legislation would also be a component of the investigative agenda, including trying to give Congress a role in the enactment of the 25th Amendment, imposing stricter requirements barring a president from profiting from a foreign government, and permanently eliminating the “anti-weaponization” fund.

    Impeachment Debate: Strategic Caution vs. Pressure from Rank-and-File

    Raskin was the lead manager for Trump’s second impeachment trial in February 2021, and does not think impeaching Trump should even be in the initial conversation if Democrats reclaim the majority in November, given the chances of conviction in the Senate are so slim.

    “I’ve not heard a single person say to me that they think our top priority should be impeachment of Donald Trump,”

    Raskin told CNN.

    “He hasn’t been convicted, and the chances of conviction on even his most gross and undeniable offenses against the Constitution are slim because he exercises even more authoritarian control over the Republican Congress than he did in the last impeachment.”

    Garcia, meanwhile, said his focus is on finding evidence of what he says is Trump’s corruption.

    “Trump commits an impeachable offense every week. But our job is to stop Trump, to stop his agenda. That’s job number one. So, for us, our job is to (do) investigations and building a case as to why this is the most corrupt person ever to serve,”

    he told CNN.

    But even if impeachment turns out to not be most effective strategy as conviction remains unlikely in the Senate, Smith argued that Democrats should not shy away from making the case for why Trump should be impeached:

    “I’m going to be all in favor of pushing that argument.”

    And while Democratic leaders have not endorsed impeachment, there is still pressure to pursue it within the rank-and-file.

    Dozens of Democrats supported the launch of a formal impeachment debate back in June 2025.

    One of those Democrats to vote back in June, Democratic Rep. Yassamin Ansari, told CNN she supports impeaching Trump but is more focused on showing accountability.

    “I do hear a lot from my constituents about how we need to really prosecute if there are crimes that have been committed and people want to see people in power go to jail if they’ve committed crimes. It’s really that simple,”

    she told CNN.

    “We think now that there could never be another Donald Trump. There could easily be another Donald Trump. There could be a worse version of Donald Trump. And if we don’t show that there are consequences, then people also just won’t trust government.”

    In her view, the mistake Democrats made after the past impeachments, which occurred before she assumed office, was trying to go back to normal afterward.

    “I think in many ways that allowed Trump 2.0 to be so much worse because they thought they could get away with the worst possible things and nothing happened and in fact, he ultimately was re-elected again,”

    Ansari said.

    Another one of those Democrats to vote back in June of last year, Rep. Mark Pocan, who is in line to chair the subcommittee that oversees the White House budget and the now defunct Department of Government Efficiency, now says Democrats need to not get ahead of themselves.

    “I think we’ve got to do our investigation work first and that’s oversight work”

    Pocan said.

    It’s a delicate balance that Democrats are trying to strike as members actively discuss how to deliver accountability without rushing into anything.

    “Everyone’s got an axe to grind with this administration,”

    Democratic Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, who serves on the Oversight Committee, told CNN.

    “I think there are definitely people who, the first thing they want to do is start impeaching Trump. We’ve already had that happen this Congress. I just want to make sure if we do impeachment, that’s it’s going to be an ironclad case.”

    Wanting to be strategic about how to investigate Trump, some Democrats say that momentum for impeaching Trump cabinet officials, particularly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, could take off first.

    “Impeaching this president has caused his supporters to dig in even harder. And his party members to dig in and defend him even harder,”

    Democratic Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, who serves on the House Judiciary Committee told CNN.

    “I suspect that some of those peripheral impeachment efforts might move sooner.”

    Balancing Oversight with Affordability Message and Governing Responsibilities

    Many Democrats, though, argue the entire conversation about a potential future investigative agenda is premature and the focus now is on winning back the House with a sizable majority and keeping up hope that the Senate could also be in play.

    Democrats say they will also be proactive in trying to tie any oversight work to their efforts to address the affordability concerns that many people face, in an effort to combat criticism that their investigations would be squarely about going after Trump.

    “I don’t think they’re incompatible. You cannot address the cost of living without the impact of corruption on the American public. So, I think they’re hand in hand,”

    Democratic Rep. Joe Morelle, who is leading the task force to create the anti-corruption agenda for Democrats if they win the majority, told CNN.

    In the aggressive pursuit of oversight, some Democrats are wary of the caucus losing sight of its affordability message. Making that connection between Democrats’ affordability and anti-corruption agenda is a critical goal for the party this fall in the final sprint ahead of the midterms.

    “If we are entrusted with the majority, we have to meet the moment to turn the ship around,”

    Democratic Rep. Chris Deluzio told CNN.

    “We have to take the economic fight front and center and we cannot only be doing oversight.”

    If they win the majority, House Democrats will also have to balance their efforts to investigate the Trump administration with the reality that Democratic leadership will still have to work with the White House on various issues to ensure basic functions of the government, like keeping the government funded, can continue.

    Democrats were split after House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently took a private meeting with Kushner. But many said later they felt reassured after hearing the explanation from the Democratic leader, who said Kushner asked for the meeting and he took it “to discuss the affordability crisis,” and said even if Jeffries were to continue taking meetings with administration officials it would have no bearing on Democrats’ plans for aggressive oversight, even of Kushner.

    Coordinated, Multi-Committee Approach to Maximize Visibility

    Instead of narrowing their list of investigations, the party is warming to the idea of conducting multiple, even overlapping, investigations at once.

    In 2019, Democrats coalesced around an investigation that culminated in the first impeachment of Trump over allegations that the president pressured Ukraine to investigate his political rivals while withholding US security assistance and a White House meeting.

    But in the current environment, Democrats want to be more dynamic and are prepared to have multiple hearings on different issues a day.

    “We’ve got to move fast and that means it can’t all live in two committees,”

    a Democratic aide told CNN.

    “In order to make people feel like real accountability is happening, you need to have a volume and that amount of content needs to be tuned to different audiences so that people actually see it or they won’t believe we are doing anything.”

    Still, other Democrats are looking to leadership for coordination as many committees have overlapping investigative targets, with Smith telling CNN,

    “it’s going to have to be a coordinated effort, not something that each committee is going to be flying off on their own.”

  • 2026 Midterms: Democrats Expand Push Into Republican Strongholds

    2026 Midterms: Democrats Expand Push Into Republican Strongholds

    Senator Roger Marshall broke with tradition on Friday, launching an attack advertisement against his Democratic challenger — a rare move for a Republican incumbent in Kansas. The race has drawn national attention as Democrats test their strength in deep-red territory ahead of the 2026 midterms.

    Democratic Optimism Builds in Republican Strongholds

    When Pastor Adam Hamilton entered the race four months ago, the odds appeared steep. Kansas has not elected a Democrat to the Senate in nearly a century, and Donald Trump carried the state by at least 14 percentage points in each of his presidential campaigns. Yet as the post-Labor Day sprint begins, Hamilton sees an opening.

    People are very frustrated, Hamilton said in an interview, recalling a recent conversation with a 79-year-old man who handed him a receipt for diesel for his truck and told him, This is why I’m voting for you.

    From the Philadelphia suburbs to California’s Central Valley, similar stories are fueling Democratic hopes of flipping the House and capturing a Senate majority by competing aggressively in GOP-held seats. Success would give Democrats a consequential check on Trump during his final two years in office and help repair the party’s brand before the next presidential election.

    Republicans Navigate Historical Headwinds and Trump’s Shadow

    Republicans acknowledge difficult historical patterns: the party holding the White House typically loses ground in midterms. Complicating matters, Trump’s decision to engage militarily with Iran has intensified a cost-of-living crisis already dominating voters’ concerns.

    Yet the GOP sees reasons for optimism: a significant financial advantage, Trump’s escalating efforts to mobilize the base, and the rise of democratic socialists nationwide — figures Republicans hope to tether to the broader Democratic ticket.

    The issues are going to be the same in my race and everybody else’s, Rep. Derrick Van Orden of Wisconsin said in an interview. People are waking up to the fact that the Democratic Party is no longer the Democratic Party – it’s the Democratic Socialists of America party.

    The GOP offensive accelerated this weekend as the pro-Trump super PAC MAGA Inc. began deploying its $400 million-plus war chest. Starting Wednesday, Republicans gather in Dallas for an unconventional midterm convention dominated by Trump, who is scheduled to speak both nights. RNC Chairman Joe Gruters has branded the event Trumpapalooza.

    Democrats are countering. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is dispatching a delegation to Dallas, while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker — a potential 2028 presidential contender — will join Texas Democrats in pushing back, according to spokeswoman Leah Hurwitz. Trump has pledged to spend the final 30 days before the election crisscrossing the country, targeting 35 races he believes will decide congressional control.

    Trump’s central role has energized Democrats and forced Republicans in competitive districts to calculate how closely to align with him.

    It’ll be spectacular, California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom told reporters Saturday in North Carolina, sarcastically praising Trump’s midterm plans. He’s an historic president – historically unpopular.

    President Trump is not on the ballot, GOP Rep. Tom Barrett of Michigan, who plans to skip the convention, said in an interview. I’m on the ballot and my opponent is on the ballot, and that’s the choice people are going to be faced with.

    Senate Map: Narrow Path for Democrats

    Democrats need a net gain of four Senate seats to claim the majority, including pickups in Republican-leaning states, while defending vulnerable incumbents. Party strategists identify Maine, North Carolina, and Ohio as their best offensive opportunities, followed by longer-shot contests in Alaska, Iowa, and Texas.

    Democrats have six core offensive opportunities and we are still expanding the map, forcing Republicans to scramble to defend deep red states as we head into November with multiple paths to win the majority, Devan Barber, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said in a statement.

    Challenges remain. In Michigan, Democrats nominated progressive Abdul El-Sayed over Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s preferred candidate, Rep. Haley Stevens. In New Hampshire, Democrats face a formidable GOP opponent in former Sen. John E. Sununu. And in Georgia, Sen. Jon Ossoff seeks reelection in a state Trump won by two points in 2024.

    House Battlefield Expands Into Redder Territory

    Democrats continue adding increasingly Republican districts to their House target list, though they must defend more Trump-won seats than Republicans must hold Biden-won ones.

    They’re operating on our turf, said Mike Marinella, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee.

    Nationwide redistricting efforts championed by Trump have bolstered Republican hopes, but Democrats believe even some redrawn seats — including Latino-majority districts in South Texas — remain competitive. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showed voters favoring Democrats on the generic congressional ballot by five points, while disapproving of Trump’s job performance by a 25-point margin and his economic handling by an even wider gap.

    Economic Frustration Drives Democratic Strategy

    For Democrats, the midterm strategy centers on voters’ mounting economic anxiety — including those who backed Trump in 2024 but now feel betrayed.

    The word that I hear almost daily is ‘drowning,’ said Democratic Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet of Michigan. Families in my district are drowning, and it is so much worse for them now than it was two years ago.

    McDonald Rivet’s central Michigan district, which Trump carried by just 2% in 2024, is a traditional battleground. But Democrats also see opportunity in Kentucky’s 6th Congressional District, which supported Trump by 15 points. Democratic nominee Zach Dembo, a former federal prosecutor, said affordability is hyperfocused in the cattle-heavy region, especially after Trump lowered tariffs on foreign beef.

    Really this race is not a Democrat versus Republican, Dembo said in an interview. It’s about change versus the status quo.

    In many competitive races, Democrats are distancing themselves from a national party brand that polls worse than the GOP and has become associated with democratic socialists such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Hamilton, for example, emphasizes strong and secure borders, calling former President Joe Biden a disaster on the issue.

    When people in Kansas think about national Democrats, they think about the DSA, Hamilton said. I’ve been asked, ‘Are you a socialist or communist?’ My answer is, ‘No, I’m an independent-minded Democrat.’

    Independent Candidates Complicate the Map

    The Democratic brand faces additional pressure where independents are mounting serious challenges to Republican incumbents. In some races, Democratic nominees have stepped aside to consolidate the anti-GOP vote. Nebraska offers a prominent example: during their first debate last week, GOP Sen. Pete Ricketts repeatedly labeled independent opponent Dan Osborn as Democrat Dan, while Osborn insisted he would caucus with neither party if elected.

    Iran War Creates Tension for GOP Candidates

    The economy remains a delicate issue for Republicans, who must validate voters’ concerns while contending with Trump’s insistence on continuing the Iran conflict. Trump said Wednesday he was not affected by the midterms when considering an end to the war.

    Republicans have largely unified behind Trump on the war, though impatience occasionally surfaces. House Speaker Mike Johnson recently said it would be great if the war ended before the midterms, but if not, Republicans can explain why that was necessary, why we had to complete the job.

    Van Orden, a retired Navy SEAL, argues the consequences of a nuclear-armed Iran would be disastrous.

    When I explain that to folks, they’re like, ‘Oh, I got it,’ said Van Orden, who is set to speak at the midterm convention. And I also remind them, especially my Democratic colleagues and many people in the media, that we’re still not paying as much money for a gallon of gas as we did under Biden. We’re not.

    A few vulnerable Republicans have distanced themselves by supporting resolutions to limit Trump’s war powers. Barrett, a 22-year Army veteran, said he is very sensitive to the nature of prolonged war.

    I haven’t budged and this is something I feel very strongly about and I’m going to vote my conscience, Barrett said.

    Trump, known for punishing intraparty critics, has largely refrained from targeting Republicans seeking distance. Vice President JD Vance suggested Thursday he understood if some candidates skipped the convention to focus on local matters.

    The White House prefers framing the midterms as a referendum on Democrats allegedly lurching left. In key House races, Democratic primary voters selected nominees national operatives fear are too liberal for general elections. Barrett’s opponent, Will Lawrence — a Sunrise Movement co-founder — faced scrutiny after CNN reported hundreds of deleted social media posts advocating abolition of police and prisons. Lawrence said he no longer supports defunding police and regretted past remarks.

    Financial Advantage Shifts to Republicans

    Republicans hold a commanding cash advantage. The RNC ended July with $130 million on hand; the DNC reported $16 million in cash and $18 million in debt. A June Supreme Court ruling striking down limits on coordinated party-campaign spending has amplified the disparity. The NRCC has already reserved coordinated ads for at least 20 candidates, while its Democratic counterpart has moved more slowly.

    Until this weekend, it was unclear whether MAGA Inc. would support battleground candidates. That question was answered Saturday when the super PAC disclosed $10 million in spending on the Texas Senate race, where Democratic nominee James Talarico has vastly outraised Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton by nearly $60 million.

    Trump claimed Friday he had almost $1 billion in outside money available and planned to spend up to half on the midterms.

    We’re going to spend a lot of money because we don’t want to lose our country, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

    Republicans also hope Trump’s campaign-trail presence reactivates his 2024 voters, even if it complicates matters for vulnerable incumbents.

    Turnout and Messaging Challenges Persist

    At a Republican Jewish Coalition meeting, North Carolina GOP Senate nominee Michael Whatley estimated his state has up to 250,000 voters who turn out for Trump in presidential years but skip midterms.

    That turnout is absolutely essential, Whatley said.

    A Republican strategist working a battleground House race agreed turnout is critical but said the solution must be much deeper than Trump’s travel schedule.

    I think there has to be more optimism that things are getting better economically, the strategist said, adding the White House lacks a clear message about when that will happen.

    Emerging Issues: Data Centers, Debates, and Outside Money

    Beyond the Trump factor, both parties are scrambling to address voter anger over data centers and their resource consumption. In Nevada’s gubernatorial race, GOP incumbent Joe Lombardo and Democratic Attorney General Aaron Ford have traded ads accusing each other of coziness with the industry.

    Data centers are raising our costs, but Joe Lombardo doesn’t care, Ford says in one ad that replays Lombardo saying in May that he is wholeheartedly in support of data centers.

    (Lombardo, like many GOP governors confronting the issue, has demanded data centers take responsibility for not straining local resources.)

    Debate negotiations will also shape the final stretch. Sen. Susan Collins and Democratic challenger Troy Jackson appear set for four October debates in Maine, while uncertainty surrounds other contests — including Ohio’s gubernatorial race, where Democrat Amy Acton indicated Wednesday she would not debate Republican Vivek Ramaswamy.

    Outside spending remains a wildcard. While attention has focused on pro-Trump groups, super PACs aligned with Israel supporters, cryptocurrency, and artificial intelligence industries still hold hundreds of millions that could influence races.

    2028 Contenders Build Midterm Goodwill

    Potential 2028 presidential candidates — especially Democrats — will increase their visibility in coming weeks, demonstrating party loyalty and building congressional alliances.

    Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is scheduled to visit at least six states in September alone. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro will campaign heavily to flip four House seats while running for reelection. Former Vice President Kamala Harris is expected to escalate her travel for candidates, even as some in GOP-leaning areas have declined her support.

    I support them in doing whatever they need to do to win, Harris said in a TV interview Thursday.

    Addressing reporters Thursday, Vance — widely seen as the de facto 2028 GOP frontrunner — urged Republicans to focus on the midterms as figures like Texas Sen. Ted Cruz generate White House speculation.

    McDonald Rivet said she was taking nothing for granted, even after Republicans in her district nominated a relatively unknown candidate, Tom Smith, over a Trump-backed rival.

    I think that this is going to be closer than most people think, she said. I think that we are going to have to work for every single vote and run hard all the way through November.

  • Trump Gave Natalie Harp and Two Aides $45,000 Each in Holiday Cash Gifts

    Trump Gave Natalie Harp and Two Aides $45,000 Each in Holiday Cash Gifts

    Trump Gave Three White House Aides $45,000 Each in Cash Holiday Gifts, Disclosures Show

    President Donald Trump gave three senior female aides $45,000 each in cash gifts for the holidays, according to annual financial disclosure statements released by the White House. The payments were reported as a “cash gift for the holidays” by Natalie Harp, Chamberlain Harris and Margo Martin, each of whom earns an annual salary of $150,000.

    White House Defends Payments as Personal Tradition

    The White House press office issued a statement addressing the president’s cash gifts to the three aides, saying, “The President has a longstanding practice of giving Christmas gifts to people in his orbit, including at times employees and aides, both in government and in his time in the private sector.”

    “The gifts at issue here have nothing to do with any of these individuals’ official government duties, and, therefore, are entirely permissible under relevant legal and ethical standards,” the statement said.

    Harp Draws Scrutiny Amid Broader Attention

    The spotlight on Harp, a 35-year-old former far-right television anchor, intensified after Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) mentioned her by name in a now-viral speech criticizing Trump. The Georgia Democrat swiped at the president’s “travel with Natalie on their apparently defenseless flying palace gifted by the Emir of Qatar,” a reference to her joining the president — along with a very limited group — when he secretly boarded a smaller aircraft to leave Turkey due to a threat from Iran in July.

    Harp, who frequently types the president’s Truth Social posts as he dictates them to her, has been intensely dedicated to Trump since joining his staff in 2022. She has trailed him across the country, feeding him positive stories, social media posts and other correspondence so frequently that allies dubbed her the “human printer.”

    Additional Aide Also Received Holiday Gift

    Walt Nauta, a longtime Trump aide, also received a “gift for holidays” from the president. He reported in his financial disclosure statement that the president gave him $20,000. Nauta was once charged in the case involving Trump’s handling of classified documents before the case was dropped.

    The Washington Post first reported on the cash gifts.

  • Supreme Court Rejects Trump Plan to Limit Mail-In Voting in Midterm Elections

    Supreme Court Rejects Trump Plan to Limit Mail-In Voting in Midterm Elections

    The Supreme Court on Monday rejected President Donald Trump’s controversial plan to change how mail ballots are sent to voters nationwide, blocking a proposal that election officials warned would have caused catastrophic consequences for the 2026 midterms.

    In one of the most significant cases on the court’s emergency docket in years, a majority of justices halted a procedure that would have granted the U.S. Postal Service unprecedented authority to withhold potentially millions of mail ballots. Even some Republican election officials cautioned the proposal could trigger chaos and mass disenfranchisement.

    The court ruled the administration “is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge” but provided minimal reasoning in its three-sentence, unsigned order. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

    Major Setback for Trump’s Mail Voting Crusade

    The decision marks a significant loss for the president, who has spent years attacking mail voting with false claims of widespread fraud while continuing to vote by mail himself. The administration framed its proposal as a “modest” regulatory tweak intended to protect against alleged fraud. Critics, however, labeled it an unconstitutional power grab the Postal Service was unprepared to execute.

    CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

    Kavanaugh Concurs on Timing, Leaves Door Open for Future

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh, part of the court’s conservative wing, wrote a concurrence stating he believed the proposal might fall within USPS authority, but that “state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.”

    His reasoning acknowledged a flood of briefs from election officials arguing there was simply not enough time to implement the order this late in the cycle. The concurrence also suggested Kavanaugh could side with Alito and Thomas to approve similar changes for a future election.

    Alito Dismisses Practical Concerns, Cites Postal Authority

    In dissent, Alito argued the practical implementation concerns raised by election officials were insufficient grounds for the plaintiff states and voting rights groups to prevail.

    “The government has a strong interest in enforcing the rule, and implementing it will also ‘en­hance the visibility of Federal Ballot Mail’ in order to better detect election fraud,” Alito wrote. “On the other side of the balance, the plaintiff States invoke the practical ef­fects of implementing the rule close to the midterm elec­tions. I take that problem very seriously, but it is not enough to convince me to deny the application.”

    “That Hail Mary pass is unlikely to be successfully completed here,” Alito wrote. “The Postal Service has broad authority to regulate the mail.”

    Bipartisan Coalition Warned of Last-Minute Chaos

    Beyond the Democratic-led states and voting rights groups that challenged the proposal, a bipartisan coalition of election administrators, former governors, and others warned the justices against last-minute changes to mail ballot procedures. The Postal Service rule required states to upload massive voter datasets to an online portal that was not yet operational. It also mandated changes to ballot envelopes that had already been purchased and, in many states, already mailed to voters.

    Officials Celebrate Ruling as Defense of Democracy

    The plaintiffs praised the court’s decision late Monday.

    “Trump’s attempt to sabotage the 2026 elections has failed,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta, also a Democrat, called the high court’s decision a “victory for our democracy and a powerful affirmation of the rule of law.”

    The administration argued the changes were necessary to secure ballots and ensure only eligible voters receive them. A coalition of two dozen Democratic-led states and voting groups countered the effort was a power grab by a president who has long falsely alleged widespread voter fraud in mail ballot systems.

    Court Prioritizes Voter Harm Over Administrative Burden

    In recent emergency docket rulings, the court has often found the Trump administration harmed when lower courts block controversial policies. In this case, however, the court determined that “equitable factors”—the potential harm to voters—outweighed those concerns.

    The emergency appeal, filed last week, was the third time the administration raced to the Supreme Court on this policy. In late August, the court allowed the president to proceed on technical grounds related to lawsuit timing. A lower federal court blocked the changes days later.

    Under the Constitution, states and Congress determine voting procedures—not the White House or the post office.

    Order Required Voter Lists, Barcodes, and Prosecution Threats

    The president’s order required states to submit eligible voter lists to the USPS. The agency would then be barred from delivering ballots to anyone not on those lists. It also mandated tracking barcodes on ballot envelopes and “prioritized” federal prosecution of state election officials who send or receive ballots to non-citizens or other ineligible voters.

    Whistleblower Warned of Mass Ballot Withholding

    While the Supreme Court deliberated, a Postal Service whistleblower issued stark warnings. The whistleblower’s report revealed that if a single ballot had a barcode issue, officials would decline to deliver the entire batch of mailings containing that envelope. The report also described a rushed effort to launch an online data-sharing system that could make the complex plan even more vulnerable to mass disenfranchisement.

    No Evidence of Widespread Fraud; Multiple Courts Rejected Plan

    Trump has long promoted conspiracy theories about mail voting to discredit the 2020 presidential election he lost. Improper voting remains exceedingly rare, and the administration has never produced evidence of widespread fraud capable of influencing the 2020 outcome or any other contest.

    Multiple federal courts rejected the proposal. Over the weekend, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump nominee in Washington, D.C., became the latest to pause the USPS rule for the midterms.