Tag: Donald Trump

  • Defense Attorney Reddington Seeks Pardon for Clancy

    Defense Attorney Reddington Seeks Pardon for Clancy

    Defense Attorney Kevin Reddington Asks President Trump to Pardon Lindsay Clancy After Mistrial

    NEEDHAM, Mass. — Defense attorney Kevin Reddington called on President Donald Trump to pardon his client, Lindsay Clancy, during a Tuesday morning appearance on “Good Morning America.” The request comes after a mistrial was declared last week in the high-profile Massachusetts murder case.

    Attorney Makes Direct Appeal to President Trump

    Reddington, a 75-year-old Brockton-based attorney who gained national attention for his fiery defense during Clancy’s murder trial, spoke candidly about the next steps in the case.

    “I’d like to say that perhaps Donald Trump, who felt compelled to speak out about this case, may very well… Mr. President, I would hope that you would consider this young lady, the type of person she is, what she has been through, and consider a pardon,” Reddington said.

    Trump Previously Commented on Case

    When asked about the case on Friday, Trump described it as a “horrible tragedy.”

    “It’s a terrible situation. Look, she did a horrible, horrible thing. It can’t be worse. But, we will find out what the price to pay is. There will be a price. It’s going to be mental institution or jail or something,” Trump said.

    Mistrial Declared After Jury Deadlock

    Clancy is accused of strangling her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in 2023. She did not dispute causing their deaths, but Reddington argued she should not be found criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis at the time.

    The jury deliberated for seven days before reporting a deadlock at 11-1, with a single holdout juror refusing to acquit. Judge William Sullivan ultimately declared a mistrial after the jury reported deadlock multiple times.

    Reddington said he respects the juror’s right to hold out but believes the juror did not follow the law as instructed.

    “(The juror) had agreed, according to the note from the forelady, that he had doubt but he would not apply the law of reasonable doubt as presented by the judge. That is not right,” Reddington said.

    Reddington made a last-minute motion to the Supreme Judicial Court to replace the holdout juror, but the motion was denied.

    Prosecutor Has Not Announced Retrial Plans

    Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz has not indicated whether he plans to retry the case. Reddington expressed hope they can avoid another trial.

    “I hope, however, after sitting through this trial and seeing the evidence that was presented from the government, as well as from the defense, that he would revisit that issue and hopefully would be willing to work something out that would be acceptable to both sides,” Reddington said.

    Reddington Criticizes Prosecution

    Last week, Reddington lashed out at Cruz for pursuing the murder case.

    “Cruz knows that he was crushed; he doesn’t have a case, he doesn’t have to stand here and say that he’s advocating on behalf of the victims and then look down to see what their names are,” Reddington said. “I’m representing a woman who is a fantastic, wonderful individual. This woman is so brave… every day she came in this courthouse, stood tall… sat there through seven weeks of a trial where nobody had anything bad to say about her except the two prosecutors and apparently Tim Cruz.”

    Upcoming Court Dates

    Clancy is scheduled to return to court later this month for a status hearing, trial assignment, and a hearing on a rule allowing a judge to review a jury’s verdict. While a timeline remains unclear, Reddington has said he is “ready to go” as early as next week if necessary.

    Attorney Details Family History and Medical Treatment

    Reddington provided background on the family’s circumstances leading up to the tragedy.

    “The bottom line is that this couple, they were a family, and they had the children — Cora, Dawson, Callan — and as a family, they were very, very, very happy. That summer of (2022), they were very happy. It was the top of the world for them and the children, and then she had the postpartum depression that struck at the end of September and into October. And this young lady had the pleasure of being introduced, if you will, to a psychiatrist, who had been practicing as a doctor for a month, who advertised that she was an expert in postpartum, and Lindsay just went to see this doctor, which was the worst thing that she ever could have done because she was then placed on all of these medications,” Reddington said.

    Reddington Prepares for Second Murder Trial

    While facing a potential retrial in the Clancy case, Reddington is also scheduled to begin another murder trial in Western Massachusetts. His client, Kelsie Cote, faces charges including murder, armed assault and battery, and withholding evidence in the Halloween 2022 killing of her grandmother.

    Reddington called Cote a “very nice young lady” and said he is “ready to go on that too.” Cote’s next hearing is scheduled for Sept. 28, one day before Clancy’s next hearing on the other side of the state.

    “Between Lindsay and Kelsie, we’ll get them done,” Reddington said on Friday.

    Notable Past Cases

    Reddington, a member of the Massachusetts Bar since 1975, has a history of high-profile defenses. He represented Dr. Ingolf Tuerk, a urologist convicted of voluntary manslaughter in his wife’s 2020 death. Reddington admitted Tuerk took his wife’s life but argued it was not premeditated and that she struck him first. Tuerk was sentenced in 2025 to 12-16 years at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center, a maximum-security facility in Shirley, Massachusetts.

    In 2012, Reddington represented Catherine Greig in a federal trial connected to her time as a fugitive with former Boston mob boss James “Whitey” Bulger. After Greig was sentenced to eight years, Reddington called Bulger the “love of her life” and said she had no regrets.

  • Who Is Kristen Welker? Trump to Report ‘Meet the Press’ Host to FCC

    President Donald Trump said “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker will be reported to the Federal Communications Commission over her coverage of his endorsements ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

    “Kristen Welker, the Unpopular ‘Hostess’ of the once great Meet the Press, now considered Meet the Fake Press, just stated that Donald Trump has ‘mixed results’ on his Endorsements of Candidates, when the recent WINS of Darline Graham and Mike Mazzei, stand at 100% for the U.S. Senate, and 98% for the U.S. House,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Aug. 30.

    USA TODAY has reached out to NBC for comment.

    Trump added, “Because of this purposeful inaccuracy, she will be reported to the FCC for rebuke or punishment. Unfortunately, she is not the only one.”

    Despite Trump’s post, the FCC has limited legal authority to take action against Welker as an individual. His comments nevertheless intensify a growing rift between the president and the journalist.

    Trump and Welker have clashed before

    In early June, Trump made headlines after abruptly exiting an “MTP” interview with Welker following a tense exchange. The NBC anchor had challenged the president’s comments about election security in California.

    The FCC is an independent agency that oversees broadcast, radio and other networks. Disney and ABC sued the agency in an Aug. 18 lawsuit, alleging an unconstitutional “retaliatory campaign” against the network.

    Critics say the FCC has become increasingly political during Trump’s second term under the leadership of Brendan Carr. Trump referenced Carr in the Truth Social post, writing that “The Press is a Disgrace to our Nation.”

    Trump’s 2026 endorsement record

    Trump has a strong endorsement record in 2026, but some candidates he supported have lost recent Republican primaries.

    In Wyoming, Megan Degenfelder, who leads the state’s department of public instruction, lost the Republican primary for governor. Rep. Cory Mills lost his reelection bid in Florida, as did Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, a controversial House member.

    In Minnesota, longtime Trump ally and MyPillow founder Mike Lindell also lost a Republican primary for governor.

    Contributing: Emily Condon

  • Trump’s $5,000 Midterm Dividend Checks: What You Need to Know

    President Donald Trump is reviving direct-payment promises ahead of the November midterm elections, pledging a $5,000 “Trump dividend” to every American adult if Republicans retain control of Congress and announcing $500 refunds for certain Affordable Care Act enrollees. The proposals, unveiled during the GOP’s midterm convention in Dallas, have drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, some Republicans, and policy experts who question their legality, funding, and economic impact.

    Trump’s $5,000 ‘Trump Dividend’ Pledge

    Speaking at the rally on Sept. 9, Trump tied the payment directly to electoral outcomes:

    “If the Republicans win, you win with us, and you get $5,000. It will be called the ‘Trump dividend.’”

    The president said the dividend would be funded by the “tremendous strength and success” of the American economy and must be spent within the United States. He did not specify a funding mechanism or total cost during the speech.

    A White House press release the following day attributed the potential payout to “unleashed trillions in new private investment” and reductions in government waste. However, independent estimates place the price tag at roughly $1.2 trillion, requiring congressional approval.

    Legislative Prospects and Political Reaction

    Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, posted on X that he would prepare legislation for the dividend. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told Fox News on Thursday that whether enough votes exist for passage is a “good question,” adding, “We will cross that bridge when we come to it.”

    Democrats denounced the proposal as election interference. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, called it a “political bribe,” while Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., labeled the pledge “corrupt and blatantly illegal.”

    Republican criticism also emerged. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis warned the plan could “lead to more debt and inflation.” Former Rep. Bob Good, R-Va., described the checks as a “socialist vote-buying scheme,” according to The Hill.

    Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, told CentralMaine.com: “From the few details we have, it seems that the proposed $5,000 dividend would not have an income cap and would be extraordinarily costly. Tax and spending decisions should be made based on the needs of the American people and the state of the economy; they should not appear to be tied to election results.”

    $500 Obamacare Refund Checks Detailed

    A day after the Dallas rally, the White House released a video and fact sheet outlining $500 payments to roughly 1 million people in 30 states who purchased coverage through Healthcare.gov without receiving premium assistance under the Affordable Care Act. The administration says the refunds stem from excess user fees collected from insurers that were passed on to consumers through higher premiums.

    Trump stated the excessive fees total $500 million: “Our Administration is doing the right thing and giving the money back to the people who were wrongly ripped off.” Checks are expected to be distributed in October.

    Critics Call Refunds ‘Disingenuous’

    Advocates note that Senate Republicans in December 2025 rejected a plan to extend COVID-era Obamacare subsidies that lowered costs for 22 million Americans. Brad Woodhouse, president of the left-leaning advocacy group Protect Our Care, said in a statement: “What an absolute joke. Five hundred dollars is a drop in the bucket compared to what Americans are paying because Trump and Republicans gutted health care to bankroll massive tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations.”

    Previous Trump Payment Initiatives: Mixed Results

    Americans have reason for skepticism based on past promises. In December 2025, all military personnel received a $1,776 “Warrior Dividend” bonus. Although Trump said the funds would come from tariff revenue, the money was ultimately sourced from military housing appropriations in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” law.

    More recently, “Trump Accounts” launched with $1,000 deposits for children born between 2025 and 2028. As of July 6, Trump said 6 million children had accounts, designed as investment starters similar to IRAs for minors.

    However, two other proposed dividends — one from Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) proceeds and another from tariff revenues — never materialized.

    Economists Warn of Inflation and Feasibility Risks

    Regarding the latest $5,000 proposal, economists caution about macroeconomic side effects. Garrett Watson, vice president of federal tax policy at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, told USA TODAY: “Given such side effects, the $5,000 dividend checks don’t make sense. The president is promising something that almost certainly can’t be done, from a policy and political perspective.”

    Watson and other analysts warn that injecting $1.2 trillion into the economy without offsetting revenue could exacerbate inflation and push interest rates higher.

    Contributing: Ken Alltucker, Zac Anderson, Aysha Bagchi, Christopher Cann, Daniel de Visé, Joey Garrison, Julia Gomez, Bart Jansen, Melina Khan and Jeanine Santucci

    Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider @mikegsnider.bsky.social @mikesnider msnider@usatoday.com.