Author: Evan Mercer

  • LayerZero Under Pressure as Selini Capital Moves $2.18M in ZRO: Can the $1 Level Hold?

    LayerZero Under Pressure as Selini Capital Moves $2.18M in ZRO: Can the $1 Level Hold?

    LayerZero (ZRO) has come under renewed selling pressure after failing to break above $1.30 several days ago. The token subsequently fell below its long-term 200-day exponential moving average (EMA), reaching a low of $1.04.

    At press time, LayerZero was trading near $1.80, up 1.48% on the daily chart. However, its trading volume fell 35% over the same period to approximately $38 million.

    LayerZero has underperformed other major crypto assets during the recent decline. CoinMarketCap data shows that ZRO was the worst-performing asset among the top 100 tokens, falling 13% over the past week.

    Selini Capital Deposits 2 Million ZRO to Binance

    Despite the broader market weakness, institutional activity around LayerZero has increased. Nazoku reported that Selini Capital deposited 2 million ZRO, worth approximately $2.18 million, to Binance.

    Two days earlier, Selini Capital received 2.1 million ZRO from the multisig wallet 0x907. That wallet had previously received 8.5 million ZRO from LayerZero two years ago.

    The exchange deposits could have several implications. Nazoku noted that the tokens may have completed their lock-up period before being transferred to Binance for a potential sale.

    So far, the wallet has deposited more than 4 million ZRO to exchanges for sale and still holds another 4 million tokens.

    Can LayerZero Whales Support the Price?

    Although LayerZero has recorded significant losses, spot-market traders appear to be holding their positions. According to CoinGlass data, spot netflow remained positive for four consecutive days.

    Source: CoinGlass

    At press time, netflow stood near -$203,000, indicating that more ZRO had left exchanges over the previous 24 hours. However, whale activity accounted for much of the buying pressure.

    Spot Average Order Size data from CryptoQuant showed large whale orders emerging between $1.10 and $1.00, making those levels important potential accumulation zones.

    Source: CryptoQuant

    Negative spot netflow combined with visible whale orders suggests that large investors may have been accumulating ZRO. Historically, sustained whale demand has helped strengthen market structure and create room for potential gains.

    Can the $1 Support Level Hold?

    LayerZero is facing intense bearish pressure. Its Relative Strength Index (RSI) has formed a bearish crossover and declined to 58.

    Although the RSI has turned lower, it remains within the bullish zone, suggesting that bears have not yet fully regained control of the market. If selling pressure persists, the RSI could fall below 50, confirming a stronger bearish trend.

    Source: TradingView

    LayerZero is currently testing the $1 support level. A continuation of the downtrend could push the token below this level, potentially sending it toward the 20-day EMA near $0.94.

    To invalidate this bearish outlook, LayerZero would need to close above its long-term moving average near $1.20.

    Key Takeaways

    • Selini Capital deposited 2 million ZRO, worth approximately $2.18 million, to Binance.
    • LayerZero fell 13% over the past week, making it the worst-performing token among the top 100 assets tracked by CoinMarketCap.
    • Whale activity has emerged between $1.10 and $1.00 as ZRO tests the critical $1 support level.
    • A break below $1 could expose ZRO to the 20-day EMA near $0.94, while a close above $1.20 would weaken the bearish outlook.
  • Ethereum Reclaims Key Level After 108 Days: Why $2,500 Matters Next

    Ethereum Reclaims Key Level After 108 Days: Why $2,500 Matters Next

    Ethereum’s 30% weekly rally has brought its first major conviction test at $2,500. The level remains important because demand had been building for months near the lower end of the $1,900-$2,050 range.

    After that supply was absorbed, buyers moved quickly through $2,568 as trading volume surged, signaling stronger participation behind the breakout. However, Ethereum’s advance stalled just below $2,458, suggesting that bulls had not yet established a firm support floor at $2,500.

    Ethereum faces key support and resistance levels

    The pause remains significant because price is currently absorbing activity near the approach to the breakout highs. Even so, the market structure does not yet indicate that the rally has triggered widespread profit-taking.

    Ethereum’s Relative Strength Index also appeared to support this view. The RSI declined from above 90 to 70.81 at the time of writing without a corresponding drop in price.

    If buyers can reclaim $2,500, Ethereum could gain momentum for a continuation toward the previous breakout area near $2,568. Conversely, a decline below $2,426 could signal increasing bearish pressure.

    Ethereum reclaims realized price after 108 days

    Ethereum’s move toward $2,500 has also changed the position of holders relative to their average cost basis. After spending 108 days below it, ETH reclaimed its realized price—the average amount collectively paid by all holders for their ETH.

    When the market price moves back above the realized price, holders are collectively positioned with at least some unrealized gain. This can reduce selling pressure because investors near breakeven have less incentive to sell merely to recover their initial capital.

    With fewer holders underwater, Ethereum could see lower selling pressure and stronger buying demand. However, this shift will become meaningful only if ETH remains above its realized price. Sustained closes above that level would reinforce the recovery, while a renewed decline could place sellers back into an unrealized-loss position.

    Ethereum ETF inflows strengthen institutional demand

    Institutional investors are adding fresh capital to Ethereum as the broader market trend improves. Weekly inflows into Ethereum investment products reached $824.42 million, up from $697.18 million the previous week.

    These inflows indicate that institutions increased their exposure as ETH approached $2,500 rather than reducing their positions after the rally.

    SoSoValue data shows that total ETF assets rose from $10.52 billion on August 14 to $15.23 billion, representing a reported 5.28% increase and strengthening institutional ownership.

    Sustained ETF buying can absorb available supply and help buyers defend higher prices during pullbacks. However, the strength of recent inflows has not yet secured a lasting move above $2,500.

    Continued inflows combined with closes above that level would provide stronger evidence that institutional demand is supporting lasting price acceptance.

    Ethereum has reclaimed its realized price as ETF demand supports the recovery. Rising institutional inflows and improving holder profitability are strengthening ETH’s attempt to break above $2,500.

    Source: cryptonews.net

  • Sberbank Predicts Russia’s Legal Crypto Trading Market Could Reach $46 Billion in Its First Year

    Sberbank Predicts Russia’s Legal Crypto Trading Market Could Reach $46 Billion in Its First Year

    Regulated cryptocurrency trading in Russia could reach at least 4 trillion rubles ($46.43 billion) during its first year, according to estimates from Sberbank, after the Bank of Russia approved draft rules allowing investors to purchase crypto assets legally through licensed brokers from September 1.

    Sberbank Deputy Chairman of the Executive Board Anatoly Popov said the forecast was conservative because only a portion of Russia’s existing cryptocurrency activity is expected to shift to regulated brokers initially.

    The bank projects that regulated crypto trading could gradually increase to approximately 7.5 trillion rubles ($87.06 billion) by 2029 as investors move toward official exchange channels.

    “According to Finance Ministry data as of February, the daily volume of cryptocurrency transactions in Russia is around 50 billion rubles, or roughly 18 trillion rubles a year. SberCIB Investment Research analysts have a fairly conservative estimate: in the first year after legalization, around 20% of this volume, or 3.5-4 trillion rubles a year, will be traded on exchanges. This figure could rise to 4.75-5.25 trillion rubles by 2028 and to 7.5 trillion rubles by 2029,” Popov told TASS.

    Limits on Russia’s regulated crypto market

    Continued use of unregistered cryptocurrency exchange services is one factor that could limit regulated trading volumes. Other constraints include statutory investment caps and the narrow range of crypto assets currently available through official channels.

    Non-qualified investors may purchase up to 300,000 rubles (about $3,800) in cryptocurrency per year through a single licensed intermediary after completing a risk-awareness test. The Bank of Russia has justified the restriction as an investor-protection measure.

    Although the central bank recently relaxed the requirements for qualified investor status, those investors remain limited to cryptocurrency investments of up to 3 million rubles (about $38,000), restricting their ability to conduct large-volume trades.

    At present, only Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT) have been approved by the Bank of Russia for trading on official Russian exchanges. Other major altcoins therefore remain unavailable through the regulated market.

    Exchanges can register by July 1, 2027, following the transition period.

  • Interactive Map Reveals Exactly Where 67 Million U.S. Crypto Holders Live

    Interactive Map Reveals Exactly Where 67 Million U.S. Crypto Holders Live

    An interactive map from the National Cryptocurrency Association (NCA) estimates where approximately 67 million U.S. crypto holders live, with data available for all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and the 435 U.S. House districts in the 119th Congress.

    The nonprofit crypto education organization presents the figures through a map hub featuring state-level and congressional district views. Users can explore estimated cryptocurrency ownership across individual areas.

    Ripple Chief Legal Officer and NCA President Stuart Alderoty highlighted the maps in an Aug. 24 post on X, stating:

    “67 million Americans hold crypto. 232,000 American jobs are supported by the industry. The National Cryptocurrency Association built two maps so you can see the data by state and district.”

    California has the highest estimated number of crypto holders, at approximately 9.5 million. Texas follows with 5.94 million, ahead of Florida with 4.71 million, New York with 4.66 million, and Illinois with 2.64 million.

    The estimates are based on the 2026 State of Crypto Holders Report, which found that roughly one in four American adults owns cryptocurrency. At the regional level, ownership generally follows the distribution of the U.S. population. The South accounts for 38% of holders, the West represents 27%, and the Midwest and Northeast each account for 18%.

    This distribution suggests that crypto ownership is spread across the country rather than concentrated solely in major technology and financial centers.

    The NCA’s interactive map estimates crypto ownership by state, with California leading at 9.5 million holders, followed by Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois.

    Crypto Holder Figures Are Modeled Estimates

    The map does not provide verified counts of individually identified crypto owners. Instead, its figures are statistical estimates based on a national demographic model and district-level signals. The model uses a sample of 10,000 U.S. crypto holders to produce a posterior mean and a 95% credible interval for each geographic area.

    The posterior mean is the model’s central estimate after incorporating the available evidence. The credible interval shows the range in which the model calculates that the actual figure is likely to fall. California’s estimate, for example, ranges from approximately 9.09 million to 9.92 million holders.

    The broader ownership estimate comes from an online survey conducted by The Harris Poll for the NCA between Feb. 12 and March 3. Researchers weighted the survey results supporting the 67 million estimate and extrapolated them to the wider U.S. crypto-owning population. The sample data has a margin of error of 0.7 percentage points at a 95% confidence level.

    Separate research provides a narrower comparison focused on bitcoin. A July study estimated that 49.6 million Americans hold bitcoin, equivalent to 18.6% of the adult population. The NCA’s figure covers cryptocurrency ownership broadly, while the bitcoin study measures ownership of one digital asset.

    Crypto ownership may include assets held through software wallets, hardware devices, or accounts managed by centralized platforms. The different storage arrangements determine how holders store and access their digital assets.

    Crypto Industry Supports Nearly 232,000 U.S. Jobs

    A separate NCA dataset measures the crypto industry’s economic impact in individual states. Nationwide, the industry supports 231,845 jobs, generates $55.4 billion in economic activity, and contributes $30.8 billion in worker income, according to an analysis by the Pragmatic Policy Group commissioned by the association.

    The employment total includes approximately 34,000 direct jobs at crypto companies, 75,000 indirect positions at suppliers, and 123,000 induced jobs supported by employee spending. The analysis estimates that each direct crypto job supports roughly six additional roles in industries including professional services, health care, insurance, food service, and logistics.

    The NCA launched in March 2025 with a $50 million grant from Ripple to promote cryptocurrency education and public awareness. At the time, Alderoty said the association’s purpose was to provide Americans with facts, resources, tools, and support for engaging with crypto.

    California also leads the employment map, with approximately 57,600 crypto-supported jobs, $16.9 billion in economic impact, and $7.7 billion in worker income. New York follows with 53,800 jobs, while Texas supports 26,500, Washington accounts for 15,100, and North Carolina has approximately 9,500.

  • New GOLD Token Wallets Sell 224.5 Million Tokens in $330,000 Solana Exit

    New GOLD Token Wallets Sell 224.5 Million Tokens in $330,000 Solana Exit

    Lookonchain reported on Aug. 29 that 15 newly created wallets linked by the tracker to the GOLD token team sold 224.5 million GOLD tokens for 3,178 $SOL, worth approximately $330,000. The sale reportedly generated a profit of about $312,000. The original data post is available on X.

    What the GOLD Token Sale Data Shows

    The report provides a limited snapshot of market activity rather than a forecast of future prices. Its figures relate to the wallets, products or market segments identified in the post, and the timing is significant because cryptocurrency activity can change rapidly.

    For the Aster move, the reported return was unrealized. In the GOLD case, the wallet attribution was based on on-chain tracking. The $SOL withdrawals show transfers from named exchanges but do not identify the owners or reveal their intentions. ETF exchange-balance and volume figures are measurements from the named data providers, not official statements from every market participant.

    Why the Developments Matter

    These developments illustrate how trading activity, custody decisions and liquidity can influence digital-asset markets. A new perpetual listing may attract both leverage and attention. A coordinated-looking token sale may raise questions about token concentration and disclosure.

    Large withdrawals can reduce immediately visible exchange balances, but they do not automatically indicate accumulation. ETF inflows may expand regulated access to digital assets, while exchange outflows can result from several factors, including self-custody, staking or transfers between trading venues. Volume dominance measures participation, not the quality or durability of the assets being traded.

    What the Report Does Not Establish

    The posts do not establish that any of the reported moves will continue. They also do not, by themselves, prove intent, ownership or a completed change in market structure. Readers should distinguish realized gains from unrealized positions and observed transfers from wallet labels.

    Indicators to Watch Next

    Follow-up evidence will include whether the activity continues after the initial move, whether additional wallets or filings clarify attribution, and whether liquidity remains available across venues. In the ETF and exchange-balance cases, subsequent daily flows will help show whether the reported direction was temporary or part of a longer-term trend.

    Until further evidence emerges, these developments remain dated market observations. BlockchainReporter will continue to separate sourced on-chain data from interpretation rather than treating a single reading as a forecast. Additional context is available in earlier market coverage.

    Source: cryptonews.net

  • Why a Famous Burger Chain Now Calls Itself a ‘Bitcoin Company’

    Why a Famous Burger Chain Now Calls Itself a ‘Bitcoin Company’

    Steak ‘n Shake Rebrands Itself as a Bitcoin Company

    Steak ‘n Shake, the burger chain founded in 1934, is positioning itself around bitcoin after beginning to accept cryptocurrency payments at its restaurants more than 15 months ago. The company made the declaration on Aug. 30 on X, following an Aug. 7 filing from parent company Biglari Holdings that detailed the chain’s sales growth.

    “From the moment we started accepting bitcoin payments, Steak n Shake has produced the best same-store sales in the fast food industry,”

    the company summarized.

    “Bitcoiners continue to help our business. We have never seen an allegiance as strong as Bitcoin holders. The increased business and savings have helped us reinvest in food quality.”

    The restaurant chain added:

    “Steak n Shake is a Bitcoin company.”

    Biglari Holdings Inc. (NYSE: BH), which owns Steak ‘n Shake, reported a 13.8% increase in same-store sales during the second quarter of 2026 at its domestic company-operated and franchise-partner-operated restaurants.

    How Steak ‘n Shake Moved From Bitcoin Payments to a Strategic Reserve

    Steak ‘n Shake began accepting bitcoin in May 2025 through the Bitcoin Lightning Network, a second-layer system designed to settle smaller transactions more quickly and at lower cost than the base blockchain.

    The company says those lower transaction costs contribute to operating savings. Instead of converting customer payments into traditional currency, Steak ‘n Shake directs the bitcoin it receives into a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, making cryptocurrency part of its financial strategy rather than simply a checkout option.

    The chain increased its bitcoin exposure twice in January, first by $10 million and later by another $5 million in notional value. Steak ‘n Shake also partnered with Fold on a bitcoin bonus program for employees.

    Bitcoin Bonuses for Employees and Promotions for Customers

    Hourly employees at company-operated restaurants have received a bitcoin bonus in addition to their wages since March 1. The bonus is set at 21 cents for every hour worked and becomes payable after a two-year vesting period.

    Customers received a bitcoin promotion of their own on Oct. 31, 2025, when Fold Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: FLD) and Steak ‘n Shake introduced a limited-time $5 bitcoin offer at approximately 400 U.S. locations. Customers who purchased a Bitcoin Steakburger or Bitcoin Meal could upload their receipt and receive a code redeemable through the Fold app.

    Biglari Holdings reported pretax operating earnings of $6.3 million for the second quarter, up from $3.7 million a year earlier. The figure covers the company’s insurance and reinsurance, licensing and media, restaurant, and oil and gas operations.

    For the first six months of 2026, pretax operating earnings totaled $2.1 million, down from $13.7 million during the same period in 2025.

    Source: cryptonews.net

  • Why Ethereum’s Exit Queue Hitting Zero May Not Be a Good Sign Yet

    Why Ethereum’s Exit Queue Hitting Zero May Not Be a Good Sign Yet

    Ethereum’s recent rally has pushed ETH sharply higher. The largest altcoin, which was trading near $1,900, climbed close to $2,500. At press time, ETH was trading at $2,459.03 after gaining more than 30% over the past 30 days.

    However, the price increase does not guarantee that Ethereum will continue rising. Data from the network’s staking ecosystem shows behavior that differs from what might typically be expected during a major rally.

    Rather than a rush to unlock and sell ETH, Ethereum is seeing continued commitment to staking.

    Ethereum staking shows limited exit pressure

    According to Ethereum’s Validator Queue, the ETH ‘exit queue’ has reached zero. The network currently has approximately 902,506 active validators, while around 42.4 million ETH is staked, representing 34.8% of the total supply.

    Source: Validator Queue

    This development comes even after Ethereum recorded a 70% price increase. Based on the current staking data, the ETH rally may still have room to continue.

    If validators expect ETH to appreciate further, exiting staking simply to sell after a 70% rally may not make sense. Stakers can also continue earning rewards for helping secure and operate Ethereum’s network while maintaining exposure to the asset.

    Ethereum validator activity in August

    In August 2026, the validator entry wait time fell from approximately 43–44 days to roughly 36 days, indicating that Ethereum’s large staking backlog is gradually clearing.

    Source: Validator Queue

    Meanwhile, the number of active validators began recovering after falling to approximately 880,000–881,000 in mid-July. During August, the count increased sharply from roughly 887,000 at the start of the month to more than 900,000 by late August, reaching approximately 902,000–903,000.

    Source: Validator Queue

    The recovery suggests that Ethereum’s validator base is expanding again, signaling strong staking participation and limited pressure to exit staking positions.

    Institutional Ethereum staking expands

    Ethereum’s largest DAT, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, has staked 5,067,309 ETH so far, with a value of approximately $12.4 billion. Shaprlink has staked more than 26,193 ETH in total.

    Fidelity has also announced plans for Ethereum staking and quarterly cash distributions, potentially adding another source of income to its spot ETF.

    Although Ethereum staking is attracting increased attention, Solana has a significantly higher staking participation rate, with approximately 68.3% of its supply staked. Around 421.8 million SOL is staked, generating yields of approximately 5.75%–6.5%.

    Despite Solana’s higher staking participation rate, the total dollar value of assets staked on the network remains considerably lower than Ethereum’s.

    Key Ethereum staking figures

    • Approximately 902,506 active Ethereum validators
    • Around 42.4 million ETH staked
    • Staked ETH represents 34.8% of Ethereum’s total supply
    • The validator entry wait time has fallen to roughly 36 days

    The continued growth in active validators and the absence of an exit queue indicate that many Ethereum stakers remain committed despite the asset’s recent 70% rally.

  • PROM Surges Over 300% as Rally Accelerates, but Investors Should Remain Cautious

    PROM Surges Over 300% as Rally Accelerates, but Investors Should Remain Cautious

    Prom ($PROM) remains one of the cryptocurrency market’s strongest-performing assets, gaining 48% in the past 24 hours.

    The latest surge extends a broader bullish trend that has developed over several weeks. According to the CoinGlass performance chart, $PROM has risen 176% over the past seven days and 326% over the last 30 days.

    Capital inflows support the $PROM rally

    $PROM’s current market outlook remains bullish, with capital flowing into both spot and perpetual markets. However, funding data indicates that market positioning could influence the asset’s direction in the near term.

    At the time of writing, the market had recorded approximately $5.47 million in net inflows, supporting buying activity. The sustained flow into the buy side of the perpetual market suggests that upward momentum could continue.

    Netflow data shows that traders recorded approximately $16.8 million in netflow over the past five days. Total buying reached about $463.89 million, compared with roughly $480.72 million in selling.

    Capital also moved through the spot market, although the flow was smaller over the shorter measurement period. During the last 12 hours, the spot market recorded approximately $239,940 in netflow and around $7.13 million in buying volume.

    Negative funding rate raises sell-off risk

    Despite the strong gains and continued inflows, the broader market data contains a warning sign: $PROM’s funding rate has turned negative.

    The funding rate indicates which side of the derivatives market is dominant by measuring whether long or short positions are leading. According to the CoinGlass chart, short positions currently have the upper hand, with the funding rate at -0.0009%.

    The sudden shift suggests that some traders are positioning for $PROM’s price to decline from its current level. Similar instances of negative funding have occurred before, with previous episodes coinciding with price corrections before the asset resumed its rally.

    If the funding rate falls further and remains negative for several days, $PROM could face a significant drop from its current levels.

    Bottom line: $PROM has gained more than 300% in 30 days as strong momentum and capital inflows drive its rally. However, negative funding points to increasing short positioning and raises the risk of a price correction if bearish pressure persists.

  • AI Agents Are Getting Wallets as Compliance Infrastructure Catches Up

    AI Agents Are Getting Wallets as Compliance Infrastructure Catches Up

    AI agents are beginning to hold digital wallets and make payments, but the financial system lacks a standard way to identify one machine counterparty from another. Solowin Holdings signed a memorandum with SC Ventures, Standard Chartered’s venture arm, in April to incubate an AI payments project called AGENPAY. The Hong Kong company, listed on Nasdaq under AXG, is developing Know-Your-Agent, a compliance engine designed to give machine counterparties verifiable identities.

    Can AI agents open bank accounts?

    “Is an agent gonna be able to open a bank account? Is JP Morgan gonna open an account for an agent?” Yat Siu, executive chairman of Animoca Brands, said on the On The Margin podcast. “Probably not gonna happen, right? So how do they do that? They have a wallet. We actually think you know agents with wallets essentially become autonomous economic actors who then basically do not just trade but buy and do stuff. They can use a stablecoin, right? We already have agents that are trading on hyperliquid. I have two hundred and eighty agents now doing all sorts of stuff.”

    Siu estimates that the eventual number of AI agents could reach “anywhere from 50 to 100 billion agents minimum.” He expects financial activity to expand alongside that population.

    “The total advertising, online advertising revenues is around $900 billion a year,” he said. “That’s all gonna shift into a kind of transactional invocation economy powered by agents.”

    “The next step, which is already starting, is that the AI agents start transacting on your behalf. So they pay for things, they sign up for services, they probably handle your financial transactions now,” Varun Kabra, chief growth officer at Concordium, said on On The Margin. “The counterparty on the other side, the airline in this case, or the ticketing platform, whatever it is, they have no way to verify whether a real accountable human is behind the transaction. And that could open a door to fraud, bots acting as humans, agents operating with no accountability.”

    “You’re quickly gonna realize because our entire financial ecosystem was primarily human-centric,” Chandler Fung, co-founder of t54 Labs, said in an interview. “The entire society is a trust business.”

    Most banks still prevent AI agents from accessing customer funds, creating an opening that Solowin spent 2026 targeting.

    “AI doesn’t have a transaction layer right now,” Atul Khekade, co-founder of XDC Network, said in an interview. “AI platforms don’t have a monetization compliance layer that they can use for, like, real transactions to execute actions. insurance companies, banks, fintech providers, airline companies, a lot of them are coming to us now.”

    Thomas Zhu, a Solowin director and co-founder of its AlloyX subsidiary, was an executive director in Goldman Sachs’ securities division from 2015 to 2020. He later led digital assets at China Asset Management (Hong Kong), which listed some of Asia’s first spot bitcoin and ether ETFs in 2024.

    “Without compliant governance, AI-stablecoin integration will remain experimental,” Zhu said in written answers to questions.

    The financial rails behind AI agents

    Solowin’s Bahrain subsidiary received a license from the country’s central bank in June to issue stablecoins, becoming the first company granted approval under that framework. The stablecoin itself has not yet launched.

    “Agents are like fundamentally about outsourcing a purchase and anyone who has ever outsourced a purchase knows that this comes with trade-offs,” Nitya Subramanian, chief executive of wallet infrastructure firm Para, said on On The Margin. “Wallets are ultimately the authorization and control flow layer of anything that’s happening on chain. Every chain, every DeFi primitive, every action that you can take on chain needs to go through a wallet. And I feel like people still don’t fully get that.”

    “I could create a stable coin backed card and give it $200 a week and just have it buy Chipotle,” Subramanian said, describing the spending limits she would impose. “So it’s only allowed to buy my Chipotle bowl every day.”

    “I think in the past 12 months, there’s been over 300 million unique users of stablecoins, which is an absurdly high number,” Patrick Kim, a researcher at crypto data firm Artemis, said on On The Margin, referring to the settlement asset that banks spent 2026 pursuing. “If you told this to someone five years ago, they would look you dead in the eyes and say, you’re bullshitting me, like you’re bluffing.”

    Stablecoin supply stood at $308 billion on Aug. 13, according to Reap’s 2026 stablecoin data. Every major bank is now expected to launch a stablecoin.

    What AI agents could trade

    “Reality is the world that we’ve been living in for crypto for the past few years has been a lot of these, you know, quote unquote unsexy use cases, right? Like bringing private credit on chain, bringing equities on chain,” Kim said.

    Zhu expects AI agents to trade those types of assets, beginning with government bonds and money-market funds before expanding into real estate and private credit. He sees the products being offered to banks as a service rather than developed entirely in-house.

    Solowin operates a tokenization platform called Ferion and backed a funding round for Libeara in April. Libeara is a Singapore-based platform also supported by SC Ventures.

    “You own the token and the token is the asset, you own the asset. It’s different. It’s what we call title tokenization,” Chris Turner, co-founder of impact investment platform Kula, said in an interview, describing the distinction at the center of the $80 billion tokenization market. Most of the market offers a weaker structure, he said: “it’s giving a contractual exposure to the economic upside of that particular asset. But you don’t own the asset.”

    Zhu identified the main challenges as “cross-jurisdictional legal affirmation, custody and regulatory compliance.”

    Solowin’s AI payments business

    Solowin reported revenue of $28.05 million for the year ended March 31, an 895% increase, according to its 6-K filing. AI infrastructure fees accounted for $22.2 million of that total.

    The company’s operating expenses reached $40.14 million, resulting in a net loss of $13.29 million. Solowin also acquired AlloyX for $350 million in stock as it expanded its reach into the UAE, ASEAN and Africa.

    “The last time we had a new financial rail was probably credit cards in the 70s,” Subramanian said. “And so it’s probably the most exciting time in many of our, if not most of our careers to be building in either FinTech or crypto.”

    “if you refuse to access it, if you say I don’t want anything to do with it, that’s no different than saying I don’t want to be on the internet,” Siu said.

  • Options Bets Turn Defensive Ahead of Bitcoin Price Showdown

    Options Bets Turn Defensive Ahead of Bitcoin Price Showdown

    Bitcoin futures open interest across major derivatives venues stood at 695,020 BTC, equivalent to $54.82 billion, according to weekend data from Coinglass. Aggregate open interest declined 0.26% over one hour and 0.38% over four hours, but remained 1.15% higher over the past 24 hours. The mixed readings suggest traders are trimming exposure at the margins rather than making a broad exit from the market.

    Binance Leads as $54.82 Billion Remains at Stake

    Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, held the biggest share of tracked futures open interest, with 142,500 BTC valued at $11.24 billion. That represented 20.5% of the total. CME followed with 116,040 BTC worth $9.15 billion on Sunday, giving it a 16.69% share. CME’s position is particularly significant because it offers a useful measure of institutional positioning.

    MEXC accounted for another $5.01 billion, followed by Bybit with $4.58 billion and Gate with $4.57 billion. OKX held $2.79 billion, while Bitget and KuCoin accounted for $2.16 billion and $1.62 billion, respectively.

    Most major venues recorded lower open interest over the previous four hours on Sunday. BingX, however, posted a 34.50% increase, while Bitunix rose approximately 1.29%.

    The broader futures market has recovered substantially from its June lows. Historical data shows Bitcoin futures open interest falling toward the mid-$40 billion range in June before recovering above $54 billion in late August, as Bitcoin rebounded past $81,000. The key concern is that leverage has returned alongside the price, leaving more capital exposed if volatility suddenly increases.

    One popular crypto X account this weekend wrote:

    “Leverage is piling up over the weekend. This won’t end well.”

    Calls Dominate Open Interest as New Flows Seek Protection

    Bitcoin options are showing a similarly leveraged setup. Total options open interest approached approximately $44 billion over the weekend, recovering sharply from around $25 billion in early August.

    The latest call-and-put breakdown showed 288,409.93 BTC in calls versus 185,234.42 BTC in puts. Calls therefore represented 60.89% of outstanding options open interest, compared with 39.11% for puts.

    Bitcoin options data via Coinglass.com.

    Trading volume presents a more defensive picture. Over the latest 24-hour period, puts represented 54.49% of options volume, with 12,380.77 BTC traded, compared with 10,339.78 BTC in calls. While the existing options book remains tilted toward upside exposure, newer trading flows are leaning toward downside protection.

    At Deribit, the largest individual open-interest contract is the Sept. 25 $70,000 call, with 11,018.2 BTC. It is followed by the Dec. 25 $80,000 call at 8,590 BTC, the Sept. 25 $85,000 call at 8,373.9 BTC and the Sept. 25 $100,000 call at 7,323.4 BTC. The Sept. 25 $70,000 put holds 7,227.3 BTC, indicating substantial positioning on both sides of the market.

    CME adds another institutional dimension. Expiration-stacked data shows CME options open interest rebuilding into late August, with contracts expiring within one to two months forming the largest visible block. Position-stacked data also shows calls expanding sharply during the final August sessions, while puts remain active but account for a smaller share of the newest bars.

    Max Pain Creates a Volatile September Setup for Bitcoin

    Max pain refers to the strike price at which option holders would theoretically face the greatest aggregate losses at expiration. Data from the largest Bitcoin options exchanges, including Coinbase and Deribit, shows near-term max-pain levels ranging from $70,000 to $80,000.

    Deribit’s levels include approximately $78,500 for Aug. 31 and Sept. 1, $75,000 for Sept. 4 and $70,000 for Sept. 25. Longer-dated Deribit expirations generally cluster near $70,000, with the exception of Nov. 27, which is positioned around $80,000.

    Binance and OKX show a similarly uneven distribution. Binance’s max pain is near $78,500 for Aug. 31, $75,000 for Sept. 4, $80,000 for Sept. 11 and Sept. 18, and approximately $73,000 for Sept. 25. On OKX, Aug. 31 is near $78,500, Sept. 4 is around $75,000, Sept. 11 is near $80,000 and Sept. 25 is around $70,000.

    With Bitcoin trading at $78,425, derivatives traders are not positioned for a quiet September. Futures exposure remains elevated, calls control most outstanding options open interest, puts lead the latest volume figures, and several max-pain levels sit below the current spot price. The positioning indicates that traders continue to seek upside, while significant capital is also buying downside protection.

    Feature/Hero image via Coinglass.com