Daily News 19

Tag: Truth Social

  • Trump Says U.S. Will Form ‘AI Force’ and Appoint AI Czar, Reports Say

    Trump Says U.S. Will Form ‘AI Force’ and Appoint AI Czar, Reports Say

    Key Highlights

    • President Donald Trump announced plans to create an “AI Force” and appoint an artificial intelligence czar via a Truth Social post on Saturday.
    • The initiative is modeled after the Space Force established during Trump’s first term and aims to oversee the fast-growing AI sector without adding regulations that could slow innovation.
    • The announcement arrives amid active industry debate on AI safety, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s three-step proposal to pace AI development and Accenture’s new role as an embedded evaluator.

    Trump Unveils AI Force Initiative on Truth Social

    President Donald Trump declared on Saturday his intention to establish a new governmental entity dedicated to artificial intelligence, posting on Truth Social that the move would manage the rapidly expanding sector while avoiding regulatory drag on innovation. According to reports from Newsweek, The New York Times, and the BBC, the president framed the initiative as a successor to one of his first-term achievements.

    “For this purpose, I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS, in my First Term,” the president wrote. “To that end, I will be announcing, in the near future, the AI ‘Czar’ — Only High I.Q. individuals need apply!”

    Details Remain Sparse on Structure and Authority

    The president’s post did not specify whether the proposed AI Force would operate as a military command, a civilian agency, or a department within the executive branch. The New York Times noted that White House officials did not respond to an emailed request for clarification on the structure, scope, or legal authority of the new body. The BBC reported that Trump offered no further details or timeline for implementation, leaving open significant questions about how the entity would be funded, staffed, and empowered relative to existing offices such as the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office or the AI Safety Institute.

    Industry Context: Anthropic’s Safety Proposal and Tech Leader Responses

    The announcement coincides with a parallel track of self-regulation within the AI industry. On September 12, Cointelegraph reported that Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a three-step proposal designed to pace the speed of AI development, warning that unchecked progress might “outrun our ability to understand and control these systems.” On Sunday, Anthropic confirmed it had selected Accenture as its first embedded evaluator to help moderate the pace of AI development, advancing the first step outlined in Amodei’s framework. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk responded positively to Amodei’s proposal, while Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang disagreed, arguing that such regulation was not necessary.

    Why This Matters

    The dual developments — a presidential directive for a new AI governance structure and a leading AI lab implementing voluntary safety guardrails — underscore the unresolved tension between innovation velocity and risk mitigation in artificial intelligence. The AI Force concept signals a potential shift toward centralized federal oversight, yet the absence of structural details leaves its relationship to existing bodies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the AI Safety Institute undefined. Simultaneously, Anthropic’s engagement of Accenture as an embedded evaluator represents a novel industry-led approach to operationalizing responsible scaling policies. The divergent reactions from Altman, Musk, and Huang highlight the lack of consensus among technology leaders on whether self-regulation, government mandates, or a hybrid model will ultimately prevail. The coming months will test whether the administration translates the Truth Social announcement into an executive order or legislation, and whether Anthropic’s evaluator model becomes a template for broader adoption.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the AI Force and how does it differ from the Space Force?
    The AI Force is a proposed new entity announced by President Trump to manage the artificial intelligence sector. He explicitly compared it to the Space Force, which was established as a distinct military branch during his first term, but did not clarify if the AI Force would be military, civilian, or a hybrid organization.
    Who will serve as the AI Czar and when will the appointment be made?
    President Trump stated he will announce the AI “Czar” “in the near future” and specified that “Only High I.Q. individuals need apply.” No names, selection process, or timeline have been disclosed.
    How does this announcement relate to current AI safety efforts by companies like Anthropic?
    The announcement came days after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-step plan to pace AI development and the company named Accenture as its first embedded evaluator. While the Trump administration emphasizes managing AI without slowing innovation, Anthropic’s approach focuses on voluntary, structured oversight to prevent capabilities from outpacing control mechanisms.
  • Trump to Create AI Force, Name Artificial Intelligence Czar

    Trump to Create AI Force, Name Artificial Intelligence Czar

    Key Highlights

    • President Donald Trump announced plans to create an “A.I. Force” to monitor artificial intelligence development.
    • The announcement was made via Truth Social on Saturday morning, drawing a direct parallel to the establishment of the U.S. Space Force.
    • The proposal signals a potential major federal restructuring for AI oversight under a second Trump administration.

    Trump Proposes ‘A.I. Force’ as New Federal Entity for Artificial Intelligence Oversight

    Former President and current Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump unveiled a proposal to establish a dedicated “A.I. Force” tasked with monitoring artificial intelligence, according to a Saturday morning post on his social media platform, Truth Social. The declaration frames the prospective agency as a direct analog to the U.S. Space Force, which Trump signed into law as the sixth independent military service branch in December 2019.

    Truth Social Announcement Frames AI as Strategic Priority

    In the social media post, Trump wrote that “the growing” influence and capabilities of artificial intelligence necessitate a specialized federal apparatus. The truncated message suggests the former president views AI governance through a national security and strategic competition lens, similar to the rationale used to justify the Space Force’s creation as a response to advancements by adversaries in orbital domains. The announcement did not specify whether the proposed “A.I. Force” would be a military branch, a civilian agency, or a hybrid entity, nor did it outline legislative pathways, funding mechanisms, or jurisdictional boundaries relative to existing bodies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP).

    Echoes of Space Force Precedent

    The rhetorical framing—”First there was Space Force … now … an A.I. Force”—explicitly links the new proposal to the signature space policy achievement of Trump’s first term. The Space Force was established to consolidate military space operations previously scattered across the Air Force, Army, and Navy. By invoking that precedent, the announcement signals an intent to centralize federal AI oversight, potentially removing it from the distributed governance model currently spread across the Department of Commerce, the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, and various independent regulatory commissions.

    Why This Matters

    The proposal introduces a significant new variable into the 2024 policy debate over artificial intelligence regulation. Current federal efforts rely on a whole-of-government approach coordinated by the White House, including the AI Executive Order signed by President Joe Biden in October 2023, which tasked NIST with developing safety standards and directed agencies to appoint Chief AI Officers. A standalone “A.I. Force” would represent a structural departure, potentially concentrating authority, budget, and enforcement in a single entity. The lack of detail regarding its mandate—whether regulatory, developmental, defensive, or investigative—leaves open critical questions about its relationship to existing laws, the private sector, and international allies. The announcement also underscores AI’s elevation to a top-tier campaign issue, joining immigration, trade, and energy as a domain where Trump is promising sweeping institutional change.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the proposed “A.I. Force”?
    Based on the Truth Social announcement, it is a proposed new federal entity dedicated to monitoring artificial intelligence, modeled conceptually on the U.S. Space Force. Specific authorities, structure, and funding were not detailed in the initial post.
    How does this differ from current U.S. AI governance?
    Current governance is distributed across multiple agencies (NIST, OSTP, DOE, DOD, etc.) under coordinating White House directives. An “A.I. Force” would centralize these functions into a single, dedicated organization, representing a major structural overhaul.
    Has legislation been introduced to create this entity?
    The source announcement is a social media statement by the candidate. No accompanying bill, congressional sponsor, or legislative timeline was referenced in the available report.

  • Who Is Kristen Welker? Trump to Report ‘Meet the Press’ Host to FCC

    President Donald Trump said “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker will be reported to the Federal Communications Commission over her coverage of his endorsements ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

    “Kristen Welker, the Unpopular ‘Hostess’ of the once great Meet the Press, now considered Meet the Fake Press, just stated that Donald Trump has ‘mixed results’ on his Endorsements of Candidates, when the recent WINS of Darline Graham and Mike Mazzei, stand at 100% for the U.S. Senate, and 98% for the U.S. House,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Aug. 30.

    USA TODAY has reached out to NBC for comment.

    Trump added, “Because of this purposeful inaccuracy, she will be reported to the FCC for rebuke or punishment. Unfortunately, she is not the only one.”

    Despite Trump’s post, the FCC has limited legal authority to take action against Welker as an individual. His comments nevertheless intensify a growing rift between the president and the journalist.

    Trump and Welker have clashed before

    In early June, Trump made headlines after abruptly exiting an “MTP” interview with Welker following a tense exchange. The NBC anchor had challenged the president’s comments about election security in California.

    The FCC is an independent agency that oversees broadcast, radio and other networks. Disney and ABC sued the agency in an Aug. 18 lawsuit, alleging an unconstitutional “retaliatory campaign” against the network.

    Critics say the FCC has become increasingly political during Trump’s second term under the leadership of Brendan Carr. Trump referenced Carr in the Truth Social post, writing that “The Press is a Disgrace to our Nation.”

    Trump’s 2026 endorsement record

    Trump has a strong endorsement record in 2026, but some candidates he supported have lost recent Republican primaries.

    In Wyoming, Megan Degenfelder, who leads the state’s department of public instruction, lost the Republican primary for governor. Rep. Cory Mills lost his reelection bid in Florida, as did Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, a controversial House member.

    In Minnesota, longtime Trump ally and MyPillow founder Mike Lindell also lost a Republican primary for governor.

    Contributing: Emily Condon