Tag: Stock market investing

  • David Booth: AI May Change the World, But It Won’t Change How You Invest

    David Booth: AI May Change the World, But It Won’t Change How You Invest

    There was a time when people could earn a living by sawing blocks of frozen river ice, transporting them to cities, storing them in straw, and selling them to households that needed to keep food cold.

    Today, we have Bluetooth refrigerators.

    That transformation is an example of what I call human ingenuity: the collective ability of people around the world to solve problems and make the future better.

    Artificial intelligence may represent an “ice block to refrigerator” level of advancement. AI already helps people complete everyday tasks more efficiently, from creating workout routines to planning vacations. Over time, it could also contribute to breakthroughs in health care, transportation, and the nature of work.

    But I am confident that AI will not change how prices are set in stock and bond markets.

    How AI could affect investing

    I constantly hear speculation about AI’s impact on the financial industry. Can AI pick stocks? Should investors put all their money into the stocks of AI giants? Will AI change everything we know about financial markets?

    To me, these questions highlight the importance of understanding how public markets work.

    Think of the stock market as the world’s largest information-processing machine. Buyers and sellers come together and agree to trades, and both sides must believe the price is fair. If stock prices are too high, people will not buy because they want a fair return. If prices are too low, people will not sell. Repeated millions of times each day, this process causes stocks to settle at prices that generally reflect available information.

    During my graduate-school years at the University of Chicago, I was fortunate to take part in the data revolution that helped the investing world understand that markets were efficient.

    Before 1960, no one knew what a market-wide portfolio typically returned. Now, with 100 years of data, we know that U.S. stocks have returned about 10% a year on average over the past century. Most professional stock pickers cannot compete with the market. There is no compelling evidence that money managers can reliably identify winning stocks over time.

    Why AI is unlikely to beat the market

    A better assumption is that the stock market reflects all available information faster than any individual or model ever could. To believe an AI agent can help you beat the market, you would have to believe it can consistently identify which stocks are mispriced and when.

    But investment returns are uncertain, and no one—not even an AI agent—knows what is coming. It is unrealistic to expect one particular AI model to systematically outperform its competitors over the long term.

    Even if AI makes information gathering more efficient, that advantage would be available to all market participants. Using AI to buy and sell stocks may therefore add anxiety and random noise to individual investors’ decisions.

    Similarly, concentrating an entire portfolio in “AI stocks” could lead to disappointment.

    Most companies will probably use AI to improve efficiency and increase productivity, which makes me optimistic about the future. However, history suggests that targeting the companies expected to benefit most from an AI revolution may not produce a successful investing experience.

    The risk of betting on the next big winner

    Many investors have compared today’s environment with the telecom companies that built the internet’s infrastructure during the dot-com boom. Consider the leading telecom stocks in 1999, when Lucent Technologies and Nextel Communications led the pack. Twenty-five years later, only one of the top 20 stocks had survived in the same corporate structure.

    Some of today’s market leaders will thrive, while others will not. Entirely new winners will emerge that few people are discussing today. Google, for example, did not go public until 2004. And who would have guessed that Levi Strauss would become one of the major winners from the Gold Rush?

    No one knows which companies will win. So why make that bet? Trying to select a major winner could turn you into a major loser.

    The good news is that investors do not have to gamble on individual winners to build wealth. A broadly diversified portfolio can include AI stocks along with many other companies, allowing investors to participate in whatever the future becomes instead of betting on what they think it will become.

    Diversification and the future of AI investing

    Public markets help finance thousands of competing ideas. Some will result in spectacular failures, while capital moves rapidly toward what works. With more than $1.2 trillion in expected capital spending in 2027 on projects ranging from data centers to chips, the beneficiaries could be Big Tech—or an entirely different sector.

    By buying and holding a diversified portfolio of stocks, investors can pursue their financial goals without spending their time trying to predict which company will become the next big thing. They will own it regardless.

    This investing mindset helps people manage uncertainty about the future rather than remain anxious about it.

    Open public markets have expanded the number of people who can benefit from innovation. Ordinary investors—not just founders, venture capitalists, and insiders—can participate in long-term wealth creation and benefit on aggregate without taking the risk of excessive concentration.

    I am hopeful that AI will help people solve major problems and improve millions of lives. It may even produce a better refrigerator. But it is unlikely to help investors beat the market.

    David Booth is Founder and Chairman of Dimensional Fund Advisors. He is the author of Stay Calm: Learn to Embrace Uncertainty in Investing and Life.

    The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

  • Investing in the Stock Market at the Worst Possible Time: History Offers Reassuring News for Investors

    Investing in the Stock Market at the Worst Possible Time: History Offers Reassuring News for Investors

    Over the past few years, the stock market has remained remarkably resilient. Despite several periods of short-term volatility, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC), Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC), and Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) have all reached new all-time highs in recent months.

    However, record stock market highs can create a hidden risk. When the next bear market arrives—and it will eventually—investors who buy at peak prices could see their portfolios fall soon afterward.

    In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for the little-known chipmaker Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia.

    Investing near record highs can feel intimidating, and some investors may be tempted to avoid the market and wait for a pullback. But how damaging would it really be to invest at the “worst” possible moment? History suggests the outcome may not be as bad as many investors fear—with one important caveat.

    The worst recessions have one trait in common

    Even the most severe recessions, market crashes, and bear markets are temporary. Although they can cause significant short-term financial and economic damage, long-term investors have historically been rewarded for staying invested.

    For example, imagine investing in an S&P 500 ETF in October 2007, the month the Great Recession officially began. The downturn was the most severe economic contraction in the post-World War II era, and the stock market took years to fully recover.

    The most important point for investors is that a decline in value is not the same as a permanent loss of money. An S&P 500 ETF would have lost 55% of its value during the Great Recession. But an investor who stayed invested until the market recovered would not have locked in those losses.

    From October 2007 to today, the S&P 500 has generated total returns of more than 600%. If you had invested $10,000 in an S&P 500 ETF at that time and made no additional contributions, you would have more than $70,000 today.

    S&P 500 total returns since 2007

    The same pattern has appeared repeatedly throughout market history. The dot-com bubble officially burst in March 2000, creating a bear market that was arguably even more challenging for many investors. It was one of the longest bear markets in S&P 500 history, and the Great Recession struck shortly after the market began reaching new highs again.

    Even so, an investor who bought an S&P 500 ETF in March 2000—immediately before two consecutive recessions—would have earned total returns of around 722% by today.

    S&P 500 total returns since 2000

    What history teaches long-term investors

    If there is one key lesson for investors, it is that the timing of an investment matters less when the investment horizon is long enough.

    Could an investor theoretically have earned more by waiting for the bottom of a bear market before buying? Certainly. But hindsight is 20/20, and it is impossible to know in real time where the market is heading.

    Instead of waiting for the perfect buying opportunity, investors may benefit more from investing consistently and remaining in the market for the long term. Even if you invest at the “wrong” time, history indicates that the market can more than compensate for that timing over time.

    Should you buy the S&P 500 Index right now?

    Before buying stock in the S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team has identified what it believes are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now—and the S&P 500 Index was not one of them. The 10 stocks on that list are designed for long-term growth and could generate substantial returns in the coming years.

    Netflix made the list on December 17, 2004. If you had invested $1,000 at the time of the recommendation, you would have $440,710 today.* Nvidia also made the list on April 15, 2005. A $1,000 investment at the time of that recommendation would be worth $1,335,252 today.*

    That performance is why investors pay attention. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by nearly five times, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. The latest top 10 list is available through Stock Advisor, along with access to an investing community focused on long-term results.

    See the 10 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of August 30, 2026.

    Katie Brockman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Source: finance.yahoo.com