Key Highlights
- Tether confirms exposure to EQIBank is less than 0.034% of total group assets, approximately $64 million based on its June 2024 attestation of $187.75 billion.
- U.S. authorities seized funds from Capstone, a payment processor used by EQIBank to move customer money through Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase accounts, alleging misrepresentation of business activities.
- Tether states it had no knowledge of the alleged conduct by Capstone cited in the Department of Justice civil forfeiture case.
Tether Limits EQIBank Exposure Amid U.S. Asset Seizure
Stablecoin issuer Tether has moved to reassure markets regarding its exposure to EQIBank, a Dominica-licensed lender caught in a U.S. law enforcement action. According to a company spokesperson, assets held at EQIBank represent less than 0.034% of Tether’s total group assets. Based on the firm’s June 2024 attestation reporting $187.75 billion in consolidated assets, that percentage translates to roughly $64 million at risk. The disclosure comes after reports by the Financial Times and The Information detailed a U.S. asset seizure that could potentially force EQIBank into liquidation.
Capstone Payment Processor at Center of Civil Forfeiture Case
The regulatory action centers on Capstone, a U.S.-based payment processor that EQIBank utilized to hold funds and facilitate customer money movements through correspondent banking accounts at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase. Court filings indicate that U.S. prosecutors seized funds from those Capstone accounts and filed a civil forfeiture complaint. The Department of Justice alleges that Capstone misrepresented the nature of its business to the banking institutions involved, a characterization that triggered the enforcement action and the subsequent freezing of assets flowing through the processor’s channels.
Tether Denies Prior Knowledge of Alleged Misconduct
In a statement provided to CoinDesk, a Tether spokesperson explicitly distanced the company from the allegations facing Capstone. “Tether had no knowledge of the conduct by Capstone alleged by the Department of Justice,” the spokesperson said via email. The company further clarified that its assets held at EQIBank were limited to “less than 0.034% of the assets of the group,” though it declined to specify the exact dollar figure. The response underscores Tether’s effort to contain reputational fallout as the stablecoin giant navigates heightened scrutiny over its reserve composition and banking partnerships.
Why This Matters
The episode highlights the persistent counterparty and banking-layer risks inherent in the stablecoin ecosystem, even for the largest issuer by market capitalization. Tether’s reserve attestations have historically shown a mix of cash, Treasury bills, and other assets held across a network of global financial institutions. The EQIBank situation illustrates how enforcement actions against second- or third-tier payment processors—entities often invisible to end users—can create sudden liquidity constraints for custodial partners. For the broader digital asset industry, the case reinforces regulatory focus on the “on-ramp/off-ramp” infrastructure connecting crypto markets to the traditional financial system, particularly regarding anti-money laundering compliance and know-your-customer obligations at the payment processor level. Market participants will likely monitor whether other stablecoin issuers disclose similar exposures and how EQIBank’s potential liquidation proceedings unfold in the coming weeks.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How much money does Tether have at risk in EQIBank?
- Based on Tether’s June 2024 group asset figure of $187.75 billion and the disclosed exposure limit of less than 0.034%, the at-risk amount is approximately $64 million. Tether has not provided an exact dollar amount.
- What triggered the U.S. seizure of funds connected to EQIBank?
- The U.S. Department of Justice seized funds from accounts held by Capstone, a payment processor used by EQIBank, at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase. Prosecutors filed a civil forfeiture case alleging Capstone misrepresented its business activities to those banks.
- Did Tether know about Capstone’s alleged misconduct?
- No. A Tether spokesperson stated explicitly: “Tether had no knowledge of the conduct by Capstone alleged by the Department of Justice.”



