Tag: Royal protection

  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle warned to be ‘discreet’ as royal family security risk deemed ‘severe’

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle warned to be ‘discreet’ as royal family security risk deemed ‘severe’

    Key Highlights

    • Simon Morgan states the threat to the United Kingdom and its assets is currently assessed as “severe.”
    • The Royal Family is explicitly categorized among the UK’s key assets under threat.
    • The assessment comes from Simon Morgan, a recognized authority on royal and national security matters.

    Security Assessment Elevates Threat Level to Severe

    In a definitive statement on the current security landscape, Simon Morgan has warned that the threat facing the United Kingdom and its critical assets has reached a severe level. The assessment places the nation’s highest-profile institutions and infrastructure under heightened risk, demanding an elevated posture from protective services and intelligence agencies.

    Royal Family Identified as Primary Asset at Risk

    Central to Morgan’s warning is the explicit inclusion of the Royal Family within the definition of threatened UK assets. “The threat to the UK and its assets, of which the Royal Family is one, is currently severe,” Simon Morgan said. This classification underscores the monarchy’s status not merely as a cultural institution but as a strategic asset requiring the highest tier of protective security resources.

    Implications for National Protective Operations

    The “severe” designation—the second-highest level in the UK’s official threat hierarchy—indicates that an attack is considered highly likely. For royal protection teams, this rating triggers enhanced operational protocols, including increased physical security perimeters, advanced surveillance measures, and closer coordination with counter-terrorism units across the Metropolitan Police and national intelligence services.

    Why This Matters

    The “severe” threat level reflects a sustained and complex risk environment driven by domestic extremism, international terrorism, and state-linked hostility. For the Royal Family, whose public duties necessitate high visibility and accessibility, the assessment creates a persistent tension between operational security and constitutional role. Security allocations, travel logistics, and public engagement calendars are all directly shaped by this intelligence-led judgment, which remains under continuous review by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) and the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC).

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does a “severe” threat level mean in the UK system?
    A “severe” threat level means an attack is considered highly likely. It is the second-highest of five levels in the UK’s national threat assessment system, sitting below only “critical” (where an attack is expected imminently).
    Who is Simon Morgan?
    Simon Morgan is a former Royal Protection Officer with the Metropolitan Police Service who served in the Protection Command. He is now a recognized security consultant and commentator on royal and VIP protection matters.
    How does this threat level affect Royal Family public engagements?
    At a “severe” threat level, public engagements proceed but with significantly enhanced security measures: larger protection details, stricter venue screening, route variability, and real-time intelligence coordination. Some events may be postponed or relocated based on specific threat intelligence.
  • Expert: Sussex Decision to Remove Children From School After 48 Hours ‘Beggars Belief’

    Expert: Sussex Decision to Remove Children From School After 48 Hours ‘Beggars Belief’

    Security Concerns Prompt Sussexes to Withdraw Children from UK School After Two Days

    Security experts have expressed incredulity over how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s school arrangements for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet collapsed into what they describe as a significant farce. The couple, who relocated to the UK from California where they have resided since 2020, pulled their children from a new preparatory school after just 48 hours. According to the Daily Mail, the move to Britain was rushed, and the decision followed security staff concerns about delays caused by heavy school-run traffic.

    Children Left as Sitting Ducks in Stationary Traffic

    It emerged that during transport to the anonymous school, the children were sitting ducks after being separated from their convoy in stationary traffic. The hour-long journey appears not to have been fully scrutinised by the security team before the new term. LADbible understands the distance and traffic placed a strain on the security detail, and in one worrying incident the Sussexes’ vehicles were unable to stay together.

    Expert Criticism of Security Planning

    Former Metropolitan Police Chief Superintendent Dal Babu reportedly said, It does beggar belief why they haven’t thought this through. I don’t think he [Harry] has helped himself or the situation by not arranging things in good time.

    In an interview with LBC radio, Dai Davies, former head of royal protection, said, If you keep a low profile, most people outside the school wouldn’t know where you are, what they’re doing, and all the rest of it. He added, Do they really need to go in convoy with two little children on the school run? If they only just kept a little quieter, kept a lower profile, they’d be a lot safer in my view.

    MP Calls for Review of Protection Process

    Dover and Deal Labour MP Mike Tapp reportedly said, Nearly three weeks after their arrival, the King’s son, Meghan, and their children remain without protection. Whatever the eventual outcome, there are serious questions about how this process has been handled. In the cold light of day, there should be a proper review to ensure decisions of this importance are made swiftly, independently and on the basis of risk.

    Parents React to Security Lapse

    Parents at the school were left confused by the security team’s apparent oversight. One mother said, Parents at the school are completely baffled. You don’t need to be an expert to know how congested that area is. It’s one of the worst places to drive in the UK. Another said: This was obviously going to happen.

    Sources close to Harry and Meghan emphasised the decision to withdraw Archie, 7, and Lilibet, 5, was made reluctantly and had nothing to do with the school itself. The move came on the same day it emerged that Harry’s disputed state-sponsored police security was being placed under review. The Duke celebrated his 42nd birthday on Tuesday.

    Sussexes’ Statement on School Move

    A spokesman for the couple said: The decision for the children to move school was taken following a discussion with the family’s security team about the practicalities of their current arrangements. The parents remain extremely grateful to all the teachers and staff for the love, care and effort they have shown their family. This decision should in no way be interpreted as a reflection on the school or the exceptional care the children have received there.

    A friend of the Sussexes was reported to have said: It’s a real shame, because they absolutely adored the school, the kids and their parents. It was perfect for them in every way and the children really enjoyed their time there. They really wanted to make it work, but they had to make a difficult decision based on the fact that the team couldn’t make the school run operationally secure.

    Children to Attend New School Closer to Home

    The children are due to start a new school much closer to home, HELLO! reports, which first broke the story. Parents at the original school were reportedly disappointed, particularly after the couple joined parent WhatsApp groups and Harry was spotted at the school gates. LADbible reached out to the Sussexes for comment.