Key Highlights
- An actress told Page Six last week that her residual payments were “negative,”
- She said the payment amount was so low that it cost her “more to print the check.”
- Her remarks highlight the unusually small value of some residual checks.
Actress Says Residual Payment Was “Negative,” According to Page Six
The actress told Page Six last week that her residuals were negative,
describing a payment situation in which the amount owed was effectively outweighed by the cost of issuing the check.
She made the point humorously, saying it cost her more to print the check.”
The comments indicate that the residual payment was extremely small, although the report does not identify the actress, the production involved, or the exact amount.
What the Actress Said About Her Residuals
Residuals are payments connected to the continued use or distribution of entertainment work. In this case, the actress characterized her residuals as negative,
and used the cost of printing the check to underline how little the payment was worth.
Page Six reported the actress’s comments last week. No further details about the title, contract terms, payment calculation, or the circumstances behind the residual were provided in the report.
Why This Matters
The remarks draw attention to the gap between the continued circulation of entertainment content and the value of individual residual payments. Without additional information about the actress or the project, the report does not establish why the payment was so low or whether the situation reflects a broader contractual issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the actress say about her residuals?
She told Page Six that her residuals were negative,
and said it cost her more to print the check.”
Who is the actress?
The source does not identify the actress.
How much was the residual payment?
The source does not provide an exact amount.