Daily News 19

Tag: Reddit

  • ‘This Is Far More Than Mildly Infuriating’: Traveler’s 17-Hour Flight Next to a Sick Passenger Draws Sympathy

    ‘This Is Far More Than Mildly Infuriating’: Traveler’s 17-Hour Flight Next to a Sick Passenger Draws Sympathy

    Key Highlights

    • Reddit user u/JustMakingSoup described a 17-hour flight seated next to a visibly ill passenger who coughed continuously and did not wear a mask.
    • The traveler later developed a sore throat and cough, raising concerns about exposing an immunocompromised grandfather during a planned visit.
    • The post attracted over 6,400 upvotes and 781 comments, sparking debate between criticism of the passenger’s hygiene and practical advice on masking and seat sanitation.

    Traveler Recounts 17-Hour Flight Next to Sick Passenger

    Reddit user u/JustMakingSoup shared an account on r/mildlyinfuriating of a 17-hour flight during which they were seated beside a passenger who exhibited persistent coughing and poor hygiene habits. The original poster was traveling to visit their grandfather in Asia, a relative with a weakened immune system, making the exposure particularly stressful. According to the post, the seatmate coughed throughout the journey without wearing a mask, blew his nose into a towel kept against his leg, repeatedly encroached on the shared armrest, and rubbed his nose before touching the same armrest.

    Health Concerns and Vacation Impact

    The traveler reported developing a sore throat and cough during the trip, which they feared could jeopardize their grandfather’s health. The flight also consumed a significant portion of their vacation time. The Daily Dot could not independently verify the events described in the Reddit post, and the details reflect the original poster’s account and subsequent Reddit comments. No medical evidence was provided linking the seatmate to the traveler’s illness.

    Reddit Community Reacts: Criticism and Practical Advice

    The post quickly drew strong reactions. One commenter wrote, “This is far more than mildly infuriating.” Others questioned whether the original poster wore an N95 mask during the flight, and several suggested asking the flight attendant about moving seats. The discussion largely split into two camps: frustration with the passenger’s behavior and practical precautions for future flights.

    Masking and Sanitation Recommendations

    Multiple users emphasized the importance of personal protective measures. One user wrote, “Always mask on a plane.” Another recommended carrying an N95 mask whenever flying, while a third urged the traveler to wear one while visiting their grandfather. Cleaning routines were also highlighted: one commenter wrote, “You need to wipe down your entire surface with wipes.” Another described sanitizing armrests, seatbelt, and touchscreen during flights, and a different user mentioned carrying hand sanitizer and masks on every trip.

    Questions About Speaking Up

    Some commenters questioned why the original poster did not intervene earlier. One user asked, “Did you speak up at all?” Another questioned why the traveler did not ask the passenger to cover his cough, and a different user suggested asking the flight attendant for help. Meanwhile, several users encouraged the traveler to focus on seeing their grandfather despite the ordeal.

    Shared Experiences and Varied Outcomes

    The thread also included anecdotes from other travelers. One Reddit user described sitting beside a coughing passenger and later testing positive for latent tuberculosis, though they did not establish a direct connection. Another commenter recalled getting sick after a similar in-flight exposure. A different user recounted a positive experience where a sick passenger wore a mask and cleaned his hands before eating.

    Why This Matters

    The incident underscores ongoing concerns about infection risk in confined airline cabins, especially on long-haul flights where passengers cannot easily relocate. While airlines have relaxed many pandemic-era mask mandates, the Reddit discussion reveals that many travelers still rely on personal N95 masks and rigorous seat sanitation to protect themselves and vulnerable family members. The viral response also highlights how social media amplifies passenger grievances and crowdsources informal health advice, often filling gaps left by official guidelines. For immunocompromised individuals and their families, the episode reinforces the need for clear airline policies on visibly ill passengers and accessible seat-change procedures.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Did the sick passenger cause the traveler’s illness?

    The Reddit post did not provide medical evidence linking the seatmate to the traveler’s subsequent sore throat and cough. The original poster reported feeling sick after the flight, but causation was not established.

    What precautions do frequent flyers recommend based on the discussion?

    Commenters consistently advised wearing an N95 mask for the duration of the flight, wiping down all hard surfaces (armrests, seatbelt, touchscreen) with disinfecting wipes, carrying hand sanitizer, and requesting a seat change from the flight crew if a nearby passenger appears ill.

    How did the Reddit community respond to the original post?

    The post garnered over 6,400 upvotes and 781 comments. Reactions ranged from condemnation of the sick passenger’s hygiene to practical advice on masking and cleaning, with some users sharing similar in-flight experiences and others questioning why the traveler did not speak up or ask for assistance sooner.

  • Man Lied About 10-Year Age Gap; Girlfriend Discovers Real Difference Is 25 Years

    Man Lied About 10-Year Age Gap; Girlfriend Discovers Real Difference Is 25 Years

    Key Highlights

    • A woman discovered the man she dated for about a month was 25 years older than her, not the 10-year gap he claimed, after verifying his age through public records and LinkedIn.
    • The man admitted he lied about his age to gain “greater access to younger women,” stating most women his actual age would not be interested and that he wants children.
    • Reddit commenters raised concerns about the ethics of age deception in dating, the medical realities of paternal age, and the long-term caregiving burden on younger partners.

    Discovery of a 25-Year Age Gap Shatters Month-Long Relationship

    A Reddit user posting under the handle u/SweetQuality8943 in the subreddit r/GirlDinnerDiaries detailed a disturbing discovery after roughly a month of dating. The poster wrote that the man had described himself as a “90s kid”, a detail that initially supported his claimed age. However, a check of his LinkedIn profile revealed he had finished graduate school before she was born, exposing a 25-year age difference rather than the 10 years he had represented.

    According to the post, the pair had been “talking daily and building a ‘great chemistry’” and he “still looked young” and “took visible care of his body”, factors the poster said made the true age gap less obvious during their time together. The dynamic shifted after their last date when the woman, having already confirmed his real age through public records, confronted him directly.

    Confrontation Reveals Calculated Deception Strategy

    When faced with the evidence, the man admitted to lying. The poster described his reaction as “very deer in the headlights.” She pressed him on how long he would have maintained the deception, writing that “he didn’t have an answer.” His stated motive, as recounted in the post, was blunt: he wanted “greater access to younger women,” reasoning that most women his actual age would not be interested in him, and that he wants children. He reportedly claimed he has only dated women under 30, though he insisted he does not go younger than 23.

    When the poster asked whether he had used the same tactic with other women, he became “cagey and awkward” instead of providing a clear denial. His final response to her distress was a line she said caused her remaining feelings to “just deflate”: “But I’m still me.”

    Community Response Highlights Ethical and Medical Concerns

    The post triggered a wave of comments examining both the emotional manipulation and the factual basis of the man’s stated desire for children. One commenter directly challenged the fertility rationale, writing: “Lying about his age cuz [sic] he wants kids? His 50 year old sperm is NOT quality. Once men hit 40, sperm quality goes down.”

    Another user described the visceral reaction to the story’s severity, stating: “Sometimes I read the title of a post and think, well this isn’t so bad, you may be over-reacting. Then I read a story like this and …….gawt-DAM, you’re not over-reacting!”

    A broader critique of the dating landscape emerged from a commenter who wrote: “You ever online date? The amount of men that lie about their age to try and get younger women is so gross. They often use the excuse they want kids, man that ship sailed. It is also so horrible to manipulate women because you feel entitled to a kid.”

    Long-term implications were also raised. One commenter warned: “Whatever young woman has his kids, will jump from being a mom to being a caretaker for her senior husband.”

    Why This Matters

    This incident underscores persistent safety and authenticity issues in modern dating, particularly on platforms where self-reported information goes unverified. The case illustrates how easily identifiable public records—such as LinkedIn employment history and public records—can contradict curated personas, yet the burden of verification still falls almost entirely on the individual dater. The man’s explicit admission that he lied to bypass age filters for “greater access” reveals a calculated strategy to override the informed consent of potential partners. Furthermore, the discussion highlights a growing awareness of paternal age effects on fertility and offspring health, challenging the common narrative that only maternal age matters in family planning. The commentary on future caregiving dynamics also points to the often-overlooked long-term equity issues in relationships with large age gaps.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How did the woman discover the man’s real age?

    She verified his age through public records and cross-referenced his LinkedIn profile, which showed he had completed graduate school before she was born, contradicting his claim of being a “90s kid” and roughly 10 years older.

    What reason did the man give for lying about his age?

    He admitted he lied to gain “greater access to younger women,” explaining that most women his actual age would not be interested in him and that he wants to have children.

    Has the story been independently verified?

    No. The Daily Dot, which reported on the Reddit post, stated it could not independently verify the events described, the man’s age or identity, or the medical claims made by commenters regarding sperm quality.

  • Employee Says Boss Ordered Them to Leave Early, Then Demanded They Stay After Finding Reports Incomplete

    Employee Says Boss Ordered Them to Leave Early, Then Demanded They Stay After Finding Reports Incomplete

    Key Highlights

    • Reddit user u/MoneyOrganic4728 shared a workplace story on r/pettyrevenge that garnered 18,000 upvotes, describing how their employer’s decision to terminate them early backfired when unfinished reports were discovered.
    • The employee strategically gave only two weeks’ notice instead of the industry-standard month, anticipating the company’s pattern of dismissing departing staff before their notice period ended.
    • After being told to leave within two days, the employee had already secured an early start date at their new job, leaving the former employer scrambling to complete critical reports without them.

    Reddit User’s Strategic Notice Period Sparks Discussion on Workplace Dynamics

    A post on Reddit’s r/pettyrevenge forum has ignited widespread conversation about notice periods, employer reciprocity, and the unintended consequences of premature termination. User u/MoneyOrganic4728 detailed their experience navigating a toxic workplace exit, revealing how their former company’s attempt to cut ties early ultimately left them without critical personnel to complete pending deliverables. The narrative resonated deeply with the community, amassing 18,000 upvotes and nearly 500 comments as of publication.

    The Calculated Two-Week Notice

    In their field, u/MoneyOrganic4728 explained, it is customary to provide a full month’s notice before departing. However, their workplace had established a pattern of telling employees to leave before their two-week notice period concluded. Anticipating this behavior, the Redditor made a deliberate calculation: “For this reason, I only gave 2 weeks instead of a month since I could reasonably go without income for 2-4 weeks until I get my first check from my new job,” they wrote. This strategic decision reflected both financial preparedness and a learned expectation of how their employer typically handled departures.

    Employer’s Reversal and Employee’s Countermove

    As predicted, the company instructed the employee to leave after just two days. When u/MoneyOrganic4728 emailed to note that unfinished reports remained, the employer insisted on their departure regardless. The Redditor described being “fine with the decision” at that point. However, the company quickly reversed course upon realizing the operational gap: “They screwed themselves by not checking if I had reports coming up before telling me to gtfo. They quickly emailed back and said ‘on second thought, you can stay for the full 2 weeks and get those reports done!’” the user recounted.

    By that time, u/MoneyOrganic4728 had already acted on their expectation of an early exit. “I emailed them back and informed them that because I expected to be let go early, I made arrangements with my new job to start early and already informed them I would be starting early. So I couldn’t stay the full 2 weeks anymore, since I was originally told 2 days,” they added. The employee’s proactive coordination with their new employer rendered the former company’s request impossible to fulfill.

    Community Response Highlights Systemic Workplace Issues

    The story struck a chord across r/pettyrevenge, with numerous commenters sharing parallel experiences of employers who terminate departing staff prematurely, only to face operational disruptions. One user recounted a similar situation after eight years at a company, underscoring that the pattern transcends tenure and industry. Other community members praised u/MoneyOrganic4728 for their professionalism in flagging the unfinished reports before leaving, noting that many would have simply departed without warning. Practical advice also emerged in the thread, including guidance on applying for unemployment benefits following an early dismissal—a detail that reflects the real financial stakes for workers caught in such scenarios.

    Why This Matters

    This episode illuminates a recurring tension in modern employment: the asymmetry between employer expectations of loyalty and the reality of at-will employment practices. When companies normalize cutting notice periods short, they erode the mutual trust that makes standard notice conventions functional. The r/pettyrevenge discussion reveals how workers are increasingly adopting defensive strategies—shortening their own notice, securing early start dates elsewhere, and documenting outstanding work—to protect themselves against employer unpredictability. For organizations, the lesson is clear: premature terminations can create immediate operational vacuums, especially when institutional knowledge walks out the door unfinished. The Daily Dot notes it was unable to independently verify the events described; the account rests solely on u/MoneyOrganic4728’s post and the ensuing community dialogue.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What happened to the unfinished reports after the employee left?

    The source does not specify whether the reports were ultimately completed or by whom. The former employer requested the employee stay to finish them, but u/MoneyOrganic4728 had already committed to an early start at their new job and declined to return.

    Is it common for employers to ask employees to leave before their notice period ends?

    According to u/MoneyOrganic4728 and multiple commenters on the thread, this practice occurs with enough frequency that workers in certain fields factor it into their resignation planning. The Redditor noted their workplace had “a history of telling employees to leave before their two-week notice period was over,” prompting their decision to give only two weeks instead of the customary month.

    Can an employee collect unemployment if let go early during a notice period?

    Several commenters on the Reddit thread mentioned the possibility of applying for unemployment benefits after an early dismissal. Eligibility varies by jurisdiction and specific circumstances, so workers in this situation should consult their state’s unemployment office for definitive guidance.

  • Man’s Ex Says Brother Yelled His Name After Seeing Husband’s Shoes in His Old Spot from 15 Years Ago

    Man’s Ex Says Brother Yelled His Name After Seeing Husband’s Shoes in His Old Spot from 15 Years Ago

    A heartwarming Reddit story about an unexpected reunion with an ex-girlfriend has captured attention online, revealing how a simple habit from 15 years ago created a lasting memory for her younger brother.

    Chance Encounter Leads to Nostalgic Discovery

    A married Reddit user, posting under the username u/brycejm1991 on the subreddit r/BoyDinnerDiaries, shared that he and his wife were visiting his hometown when they unexpectedly ran into his ex-girlfriend. The two remain on good terms, and after exchanging pleasantries, she asked him to wait.

    She told him, ‘I have a kind of funny story for you.’

    A Shoe Habit That Became a Signal

    The story transported him back to 2009, when they were dating. He recalled his routine:

    ‘Every time I went over to her house, I would take my shoes off and leave them neatly by a specific door. Her little brother, who was like 5 at the time, would always know if I was there cause he would see my shoes when getting in the house, and you could hear him yell, ‘Yay, Bryce is here’ from the basement.”

    The Trigger: Husband’s Shoes in the Same Spot

    The Redditor noted that his ex is now married with a child, and her brother — once 5 years old — is now in college while living at home. During a recent visit to her parents’ house, the brother returned from class and immediately asked:

    “Where’s Bryce?”

    Confused, his ex responded:

    “What do you mean?”

    The Reddit user explained the remarkable coincidence: “Apparently, in the 15+ years since we broke up, no one had ever put their shoes in that spot. And on this day, for no particular reason, her husband decided to take his off and put them there. So when her brother came home from class, the husband’s shoes triggered an ‘old friend’ response in his brain and tried to seek me out.”

    A Lasting, Innocuous Impression

    The poster said he was deeply touched to learn he had made such a lasting impression. He concluded his post writing:

    “Something so innocuous would cause him to be like, ‘let’s go find him.’”

    The post garnered 237 comments as of publication, sparking an outpouring of wholesome reactions.

    Community Reaction: ‘A Nice Little Healer’

    One commenter wrote:

    “Very wholesome! And I hope you at least told your ex that you said hi to her brother. It’s freaking cool that he has a fond memory of you.”

    Another user shared:

    “After reading all the depressing shit on this sub, this was a nice little healer. Thanks for sharing.”

    A third suggested:

    “Aww, you should go over there and give dude a hug lol.”

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the events described in this post. The details above reflect the account as shared on r/BoyDinnerDiaries.

  • ‘The Things We Take for Granted’: User Survives Over a Year of Homelessness in Storage Unit

    ‘The Things We Take for Granted’: User Survives Over a Year of Homelessness in Storage Unit

    A Reddit user’s account of surviving homelessness by living in a storage unit for over a year has resonated widely on the r/confession subreddit, drawing thousands of upvotes and a flood of similar stories from people who have faced housing instability.

    Redditor shares year-long storage unit survival story

    User u/wildnightout posted on r/confession detailing how they rented a storage unit after becoming ‘homeless and unemployed.’ While collecting unemployment benefits, they had just enough income to cover the unit’s rent. The arrangement lasted for more than a year.

    According to the post, the user also maintained a gym membership primarily to access showers. They spent most days at parks and public libraries while applying for jobs. Eventually, they re-entered the workforce and were able to afford a one-bedroom apartment.

    Reflecting on basic necessities

    Looking back on the experience, the user wrote:

    “The things we take for granted, simply having running water or a toilet.”

    Additional details emerge in post edits

    In an edit to the original post, u/wildnightout clarified that the storage facility was somewhat remote. They only slept inside the unit during cold or rainy weather; otherwise, they slept in a tent. To avoid detection, they came and went during rush hour or other busy periods.

    The post had received over 7,500 upvotes at the time of publication.

    Storage units not designed for habitation

    Important context: Storage units are not designed as residential spaces. This account does not establish that such arrangements are safe or legally permitted at other facilities.

    Community response highlights widespread housing insecurity

    The comment section became a forum for others to share unconventional survival strategies during periods of homelessness. Many related directly to the OP’s experience.

    Commenters describe offices, campuses, and vehicles as shelter

    • One user said they lived in an office while pursuing a master’s degree.
    • Another recalled being homeless during undergraduate studies and using a university’s 24-hour library and study pods to get by.
    • A commenter described a friend whose family could not afford housing; the friend stored belongings in a dorm room, showered in student bathrooms, and slept in a student lounge before a professor provided office access.
    • Others reported sleeping in cars or empty campus spaces.

    One commenter offered concise support:

    “We do what we gotta do to survive.”

    Verification note

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the events described in the Reddit post. The details above reflect the account as shared on r/confession by u/wildnightout. Storage units are not designed as residential spaces, and this account does not establish that such arrangements are safe or legally permitted at other facilities.

  • Reddit User Revokes Friend’s Apartment Patio Access After Dates: “Permanent Invitation”

    Reddit User Revokes Friend’s Apartment Patio Access After Dates: “Permanent Invitation”

    A Reddit user revoked his friend’s access to a private apartment rooftop patio after discovering the friend had been repeatedly using the space for dates. The user, who posts under the handle Critical-Salary-4669, shared the story on the r/AITAPod subreddit to ask whether he was wrong to remove access without a second warning.

    How the Arrangement Began

    The situation started when the friend asked to bring a woman to the rooftop because his own building was under construction. The original poster (OP) agreed and provided guest access through the building’s app system.

    Access Expanded Without Permission

    Over time, the friend began using the patio far beyond the original agreement. OP discovered through the building app that the friend had used the guest access several additional times. The friend eventually admitted he had been bringing different women to the rooftop as part of his dating routine.

    “I later realized through the building app that he’d used my guest access several more times. When I asked him about it he laughed and admitted he’d been bringing dates there because the rooftop had become his ‘secret weapon,’” the user wrote. “And based on what he told me he never corrected them when they assumed he lived in the building, which I thought was pretty weird.”

    OP said he became uncomfortable with the continued use and wanted it to stop. He subsequently revoked the friend’s access. The friend later attempted to bring another date to the rooftop, only to find his entry code no longer worked.

    Friend Reacts Angrily After Being Denied Entry

    According to the post, the friend was upset and contacted OP after the failed date attempt.

    “Apparently he had planned the whole date around the rooftop and suddenly had nowhere to take her, so they basically stood outside figuring out what to do next,” the user wrote. “Now he’s pissed because he says even if I wanted to revoke access, I should’ve warned him so he could make other plans. I think after being told to stop using someone else’s building for dates, you probably shouldn’t assume the code is still yours to use.”

    Reddit Community Weighs In

    The post garnered over 3,400 upvotes and 246 comments. The discussion centered on whether OP had an obligation to provide an additional warning before cutting off access.

    Many commenters supported OP’s decision, arguing the friend had already crossed a clear boundary.

    “Yep. Friend disrespected his boundary, then laughed in his face when told to stop. Simply taking back access required no further notification. In fact, having the friend be embarrassed on one random date was the perfect (and reasonable severity) way to let his friend know that OP is no pushover, and not to abuse his generosity in the future,” one user wrote.

    Others criticized the friend’s behavior toward his dates.

    “NTA. Your friend is shady and using your rooftop to lie to dates. He’s a douche,” the commenter wrote.

    Several users noted that OP had already expressed discomfort, which should have served as sufficient notice.

    “A normal person would understand that you saying you weren’t comfortable with him using it anymore was a warning,” one commenter wrote.

    Ongoing Debate: Privilege vs. Permanent Arrangement

    The thread largely debated whether the rooftop access constituted an ongoing arrangement or a revocable privilege. Most commenters viewed it as a privilege the apartment resident could withdraw at any time, especially after the friend ignored the initial request to stop.

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the events described in the Reddit post, which are based solely on Critical-Salary-4669’s account.

  • Bride Refuses to Share Honeymoon Suite Location With Maid of Honor Sister: ‘I Wasn’t Comfortable’

    Bride Refuses to Share Honeymoon Suite Location With Maid of Honor Sister: ‘I Wasn’t Comfortable’

    A Reddit post in the r/aitaweddings community has sparked discussion after a bride detailed her decision to withhold her honeymoon suite location from her sister, who was serving as maid of honor. According to the bride, her sister requested the hotel details weeks before the wedding under the pretense of planning a surprise decoration for the newlyweds’ return from the reception.

    Surprise Plans Met With Boundary Concerns

    The bride explained that her sister had been heavily involved in wedding planning and preparation. Several weeks before the ceremony, the sister asked which hotel the couple would be staying at after the reception. The bride said she gave a vague response because she did not want to disclose the specific location. Her sister then revealed the reason: she wanted the hotel name so she could access the room and decorate it with balloons, rose petals, and champagne while the couple was at the reception.

    The bride stated she appreciated the gesture but was not comfortable with anyone entering the room before she and her husband arrived. She also noted she had specifically booked a nicer suite for the occasion and did not feel additional decorations were necessary.

    Escalation and Family Involvement

    After the bride declined the surprise, she said her sister went behind her back and asked her fiancé for the hotel’s name. He also declined to share the information. When neither sibling would provide the location, the bride reported her sister told her she was “robbing her of something maid of honors traditionally get to do.” The bride added that her mother agreed with the sister and questioned why she was being secretive about the hotel’s location.

    Reddit Community Weighs In

    Numerous commenters on the thread supported the bride’s decision to keep the hotel location private. One commenter argued the sister should have respected the boundary once she learned the surprise was unwanted.

    “It’s not a gift if it’s not wanted. Why does she still want to decorate knowing that you wouldn’t enjoy it? Sounds like that’s about her, not you, and your wedding is supposed to be about you,”

    the commenter wrote.

    Another commenter criticized the sister’s persistence and the mother’s involvement.

    “I’m almost 50 and I’ve never heard of this. She’s being very intrusive. Mom needs to butt out as well, you aren’t children anymore, she isn’t needed to referee disputes,”

    they wrote.

    No Resolution Confirmed

    The bride has not provided an update regarding whether she and her sister resolved the disagreement or if the planned honeymoon surprise took place. The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the claims made in the r/aitaweddings post, which are based solely on the bride’s account shared on Reddit.

  • Best Friend’s Fiancée Mistakenly Thinks Woman Wants Him After She Explains Why She Doesn’t

    Best Friend’s Fiancée Mistakenly Thinks Woman Wants Him After She Explains Why She Doesn’t

    Reddit User Questions Role in Best Friend’s Engagement Fallout After Fiancée’s Confrontation

    A woman turned to the Reddit community r/AmITheAsshole to ask whether she may have ruined her best friend’s engagement. The user, Salt-Courage-5264, shared the story in a post that had received 9,600 upvotes and 420 comments at the time of writing.

    Longtime Friendship Complicated by Engagement

    The original poster (OP) explained she has been best friends with a man named David for years. She maintains she has no romantic feelings for him and that he is not the type of person she would want to be with romantically. When David met his fiancée, Trish, OP was thrilled and noticed positive changes in him. She was happy to learn of their engagement and accepted when David asked her to be his best “man” at the wedding.

    Dinner Confrontation Leads to Fallout

    The situation changed when Trish and members of her bridal party asked OP to meet for dinner. OP described feeling ambushed by the conversation that followed:

    “Trish and her MOH asked me if David and I ever hooked up and flat out if I was in love with him. I said we never had and that I wasn’t. Trish seemed weirded out by that answer and pushed. It went from being ‘do you like David?’ to ‘why don’t you like David?’ real fast. I deflected and said he wasn’t my type but they kept pushing. Finally I said he’s arrogant and I don’t have the energy to feed his ego and that’s not what I want in a partner. The rest of the bridesmaids kind of laughed. Trish and her MOH got upset, so we ended the night.”

    Wedding Party Fallout Ensues

    The situation has since become awkward for everyone involved. In the wedding party group chat, Trish said she did not want OP to be part of the wedding. She told the group that OP had called David an egomaniac and said she did not feel comfortable having her at the wedding. David sided with Trish, which only worsened tensions between OP and Trish.

    David’s sister said Trish wasn’t happy with the conversation and believed that OP wanted to be with him. OP wondered whether she had made a mistake by saying anything at all or had fallen into what she described as one of David’s manipulative traps.

    Reddit Community Largely Supports Original Poster

    Many Reddit users sided with OP and criticized Trish’s handling of the conversation. One commenter wrote:

    “Trish cornered and interrogated you, then got mad when you gave an honest answer instead of playing along with her security test.”

    Another commenter attributed Trish’s reaction to insecurity:

    “Wow. Tell me you’re insecure without telling me you’re insecure…. I don’t see that lasting. Tell him to save money and elope then when the divorce happens he won’t be still paying off the wedding expenses. NTA.”

    Several commenters attributed Trish’s reaction to insecurity about OP’s relationship with David.

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the events described in the post. The account is based solely on the author’s version of events shared on r/AmITheAsshole.

  • Reddit User Says Father Expects Financial Support After College: ‘I Want My Own Life’

    Reddit User Says Father Expects Financial Support After College: ‘I Want My Own Life’

    A Reddit user’s post detailing their father’s expectation that they financially support the family after graduating college has sparked a significant discussion online, drawing thousands of upvotes and hundreds of comments on the platform.

    The thread, posted by user u/Double-Singer-6631 in the r/GirlDinnerDiaries community, has accumulated 4,600 upvotes and 562 comments. The original poster (OP) describes a family dynamic where their father, who has nine children—including a 4-month-old, a 7-year-old, a 12-year-old, and a 16-year-old still living at home—reportedly has no savings and has used a daughter’s credit card for major purchases such as a car.

    Older Sibling Precedent and Father’s Retirement Plan

    According to the user, their older sister began providing financial assistance to the family several years ago. Following this, the father allegedly began discussing his retirement and his intention to rely on his children for financial support.

    The situation came to a head recently when the father addressed the OP directly regarding their impending graduation.

    “My dad approached me today and told me that since I finish my undergrad this summer, he’s so excited for me to start working so I can also begin providing for the family like my sister. He said he wants to stop working soon,”

    the user wrote in the post.

    User Cites Personal Hardship and Lack of Parental Support

    The OP states they are currently facing their own financial struggles and health challenges, which they feel their father has disregarded.

    “I have no car. I travel so far for my education that I’m physically exhausted, especially because I have an autoimmune disease. My dad has never helped me with anything. I have no money and barely any decent clothes because I’d rather his money go toward the younger kids,”

    the post said.

    The user closed their post with a direct question to the community:

    “Am I wrong for having absolutely no desire to start funding my parents’ lifestyle?”

    Confrontation Leads to Resentment

    The user described the fallout after they pushed back against the expectation. They recounted their father’s response and their own resulting feelings.

    “He said, ‘Wow, so you want me to work until I’m old? Fine then.’ You can’t guilt-trip me like that, dude. You chose to have nine children. I didn’t. Maybe I’ll feel bad about saying all of this later, but right now, I completely resent him.”

    Reddit Community Reacts: Support for Boundaries

    The vast majority of commenters expressed support for the OP, validating their refusal to act as a retirement plan for their parents. Many questioned the expectation that adult children should bear the financial burden of their parents’ choices regarding family size and savings.

    One commenter wrote emphatically:

    “You owe that guy nothing. That’s HIS responsibility! Go live your best life.”

    Other users echoed the sentiment that the father’s lack of financial planning and decision to have a large family without adequate resources should not constitute an obligation for the children. Several commenters cautioned against romanticizing multigenerational financial arrangements, noting that cohabitation and shared expenses are not realistic or feasible solutions for every family dynamic.

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the claims made in the post, which are based solely on the author’s account shared on r/GirlDinnerDiaries.

  • Sibling Questions Whether Paying Only for Sister’s Dinner Was a Mistake After Her Frustrating Announcement

    Sibling Questions Whether Paying Only for Sister’s Dinner Was a Mistake After Her Frustrating Announcement

    Reddit User Refuses to Cover Unexpected Guests at Sister’s Birthday Dinner

    A Reddit user sparked a viral debate after refusing to pay for 11 people at their sister’s 30th birthday dinner when they had only agreed to cover their sibling’s meal. The post, shared on r/AITApod, garnered 4,800 upvotes and 542 comments at the time of writing, with the overwhelming majority of Redditors siding with the original poster (OP).

    Birthday Plans Take an Unexpected Turn

    The OP offered to take their sister out for a birthday dinner as a gift, intending it to be a one-on-one celebration. However, upon arriving at the restaurant, they discovered the reservation list had expanded significantly.

    There were 11 people on it. When I asked what happened, she said she invited some friends and our cousins because “you said you were taking me out.” She knows I have some money saved from my prize, and I think that turned into me apparently having endless money in her head.

    The OP did not disclose details about the prize money. When they arrived, one of the sister’s friends thanked them for covering everyone’s meal, revealing the sister had announced the OP would foot the entire bill. Feeling blindsided, the OP paid only for themselves and their sister before leaving the restaurant.

    Family Fallout Ensues

    The decision triggered immediate conflict. The sister accused the OP of public humiliation, while their mother argued they should have paid and addressed the issue privately since it was a birthday celebration.

    My sister was furious and said I humiliated her in front of everyone. I told her that promising my money to ten people without asking was what embarrassed her. My mom says I should have paid and dealt with it privately afterward because it was her birthday. I probably could have afforded the whole thing. I just did not want to after finding out like that.

    Reddit Community Overwhelmingly Supports OP

    Commenters were nearly unanimous in their judgment that the OP was not the problem (NTA). Many criticized the sister’s entitlement and the mother’s enabling behavior.

    NTA. The fact that your mother didn’t tell your sister that what she did was incredibly rude and presumptuous is wild to me. Ask your mother if she would ever pull a move like that or if she would be defending you if the situation were reversed.

    Another top comment highlighted the principle of the matter:

    NTA. You gave her two presents that day. Dinner and a lesson.

    A third commenter emphasized that the OP fulfilled their original commitment:

    You did exactly what you offered to do, you paid for her dinner. If she was a lady and had at some point learned manners, she would have paid for her own guests. But honestly, had she learned manners, she would not have invited guests to a private dinner. NTA.

    Consensus on Boundaries and Expectations

    The consensus across the thread was clear: the sister overstepped by inviting additional guests and announcing someone else would pay without consent. Commenters stressed that financial ability does not create obligation, and the OP’s decision to honor only their original agreement was justified.

    The Daily Dot was unable to independently verify the claims made in the Reddit post, which are based solely on the author’s account of the events shared on r/AITAPod.