Daily News 19

Tag: Postpartum psychosis

  • Lindsay Clancy’s Ex, Patrick, Says Accountability Still Matters in Her Murder Case

    Lindsay Clancy’s Ex, Patrick, Says Accountability Still Matters in Her Murder Case

    Key Highlights

    • Patrick Clancy, father of three children who died in a family tragedy, appeared in a new 60 Minutes clip aired on CBS discussing mental illness in the context of the case.
    • Clancy stated that compassion and accountability are not mutually exclusive when mental illness is a factor in a homicide case.
    • The interview addresses the intersection of criminal justice and severe mental health crises following the deaths of his children.

    Patrick Clancy Advocates for Nuanced Approach to Mental Illness in Homicide Case

    A new segment from 60 Minutes broadcast on CBS features Patrick Clancy, the husband of Lindsay Clancy, offering a public perspective on the criminal case stemming from the deaths of their three children in Duxbury, Massachusetts. In the televised interview, Clancy articulated a position that seeks to bridge the often polarized concepts of justice and mercy. He asserted that the legal system can and should hold individuals accountable for lethal acts while simultaneously recognizing the profound impact of severe mental illness on culpability.

    The Core Argument: Coexistence of Justice and Compassion

    During the 60 Minutes appearance, Clancy addressed the central tension of the prosecution against his wife, who has been charged with murder in connection with the January 2023 deaths of their children—Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Clancy argued that acknowledging Lindsay Clancy’s documented struggle with postpartum psychosis does not negate the gravity of the loss, but rather provides essential context for understanding the tragedy. He maintained that a just outcome requires the system to navigate the dual realities of horrific harm and debilitating psychiatric crisis without forcing a false choice between punishment and treatment.

    Case Background and Public Discourse

    The case has drawn intense national scrutiny since the incident in early 2023, becoming a flashpoint for debate over how the American legal system handles maternal filicide driven by postpartum psychosis. Lindsay Clancy’s defense team has centered their strategy on her severe mental state at the time, citing diagnoses including postpartum depression and psychosis. Patrick Clancy’s public stance—supporting his wife while mourning their children—has been a rare and influential voice in the conversation, challenging conventional narratives that often demand retribution in cases involving child victims. The 60 Minutes clip represents his most prominent media engagement to date on the subject.

    Why This Matters

    The Clancy case sits at the intersection of criminal law, psychiatric medicine, and public policy regarding perinatal mental health. Legal experts note that the outcome could influence how future cases involving postpartum psychosis are charged and adjudicated, particularly regarding the application of the insanity defense or mitigation at sentencing. Meanwhile, maternal health advocates argue the tragedy underscores systemic failures in screening, diagnosis, and acute care for perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. As the legal proceedings continue, the public statements by Patrick Clancy add a unique dimension: a surviving parent and victim’s advocate urging the system to incorporate clinical reality into its pursuit of justice.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Patrick Clancy’s position on his wife’s prosecution?
    Patrick Clancy has publicly stated that compassion and accountability can coexist. He acknowledges the severity of the crime but argues that his wife’s severe postpartum psychosis must be a central factor in how the justice system resolves the case.
    What charges does Lindsay Clancy face?
    Lindsay Clancy has been charged with murder in connection with the deaths of the couple’s three children in January 2023. She has pleaded not guilty, with her defense citing severe postpartum psychosis.
    Where can the full interview be viewed?
    The clip aired on CBS as part of 60 Minutes. Full episodes and segments are typically available on the CBS News website, the 60 Minutes streaming platform, and Paramount+.
  • Patrick Clancy Expecting First Child with Wife Rachel Danis

    Patrick Clancy Expecting First Child with Wife Rachel Danis

    Key Highlights

    • Patrick Clancy, who lost his three children in 2023, is expecting his first child with new wife Rachel Danis.
    • The couple sat down for a joint interview with “60 Minutes” to discuss their journey forward.
    • Lindsay Clancy, Patrick’s first wife, was charged in connection with the deaths of their three children.

    Patrick Clancy Shares Story of Loss and New Beginnings

    Patrick Clancy, the Massachusetts father whose three young children were killed in 2023, has revealed he is expecting his first child with his new wife, Rachel Danis. The announcement comes nearly two years after the tragedy that claimed the lives of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Their mother, Lindsay Clancy, was charged with murder and other offenses in connection with their deaths.

    Couple Opens Up in “60 Minutes” Interview

    Patrick and Rachel sat down for an interview with “60 Minutes” to discuss their path through grief, healing, and the decision to build a future together. The conversation marks one of the most extensive public statements Patrick has made since the loss of his children, offering insight into how he has navigated unimaginable sorrow while finding a way forward.

    A Path Toward Healing

    Since the tragedy, Patrick Clancy has become an advocate for maternal mental health awareness, speaking publicly about the importance of recognizing and treating postpartum psychosis. His remarriage to Rachel Danis and the news of their expected child represent a profound personal milestone in a journey that has drawn national attention to gaps in maternal healthcare and support systems.

    Why This Matters

    The Clancy case sparked widespread discussion about postpartum mental health, the legal system’s handling of maternal filicide cases involving severe psychiatric illness, and the need for better screening and support for new mothers. Patrick Clancy’s public advocacy has contributed to legislative conversations in Massachusetts and beyond regarding mandatory postpartum depression screenings and expanded mental health resources for parents. His decision to share his personal story of remarriage and impending fatherhood adds another chapter to a public narrative that has already influenced policy debates and raised awareness about a critical but often overlooked aspect of maternal health.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What happened to Patrick Clancy’s first three children?

    In January 2023, Patrick Clancy’s three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — were killed. Their mother, Lindsay Clancy, was charged with two counts of murder, three counts of strangulation, and three counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. Her defense has cited severe postpartum psychosis.

    Who is Rachel Danis?

    Rachel Danis is Patrick Clancy’s current wife. The couple married after the loss of his first three children and have recently announced they are expecting their first child together.

    Has Patrick Clancy spoken publicly about the tragedy before?

    Yes. Patrick Clancy has given previous statements and has become an advocate for maternal mental health awareness, specifically calling for better screening and treatment of postpartum psychosis. The “60 Minutes” interview with his wife Rachel represents a significant joint appearance discussing their shared future.

  • Patrick Clancy and Wife Rachel Danis Confirm They’re Starting a Family

    Patrick Clancy and Wife Rachel Danis Confirm They’re Starting a Family

    Key Highlights

    • Patrick Clancy states he thinks about his children “every moment of the day” following their 2023 deaths.
    • The statement comes weeks after the conclusion of Lindsay Clancy’s trial for the murders of their children.
    • Clancy affirms his children’s memory “will live on in his future kids.”

    Patrick Clancy Opens Up on Life After Unimaginable Loss

    Patrick Clancy has offered a raw glimpse into his daily reality following the 2023 murders of his children, a tragedy for which his ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy, recently stood trial. In a statement reflecting the persistent weight of grief, Clancy revealed that the memory of his children occupies his thoughts continuously. “Patrick Clancy thinks about his children every moment of the day—and their memory will live on in his future kids,” according to the source material detailing his current mindset.

    Aftermath of the Lindsay Clancy Trial

    The public remarks arrive in the weeks following the legal proceedings against Lindsay Clancy, who faced charges for the 2023 killings of the couple’s children. The trial’s conclusion marks a significant, though undoubtedly painful, milestone in a case that has drawn intense public scrutiny. While the source does not detail the trial’s specific outcome, the timing of Patrick Clancy’s comments underscores the ongoing personal aftermath that extends far beyond the courtroom verdict.

    A Father’s Enduring Tribute

    Clancy’s declaration that his children’s legacy will endure through “his future kids” signals a profound commitment to honoring their lives moving forward. This perspective frames his grief not merely as a retrospective sorrow but as an active, living influence on his path ahead. The sentiment highlights the complex, long-term journey of a parent navigating loss of this magnitude while contemplating a future that still holds the possibility of family.

    Why This Matters

    This case represents a devastating instance of filicide that has resonated deeply within the public consciousness, raising difficult questions about maternal mental health, postpartum psychosis, and the systemic support structures available to families in crisis. Patrick Clancy’s public stance—characterized by a focus on remembrance rather than retribution in his recent remarks—offers a rare window into the private resilience required to survive such a loss. As the legal chapter closes, the broader conversation continues regarding how society identifies and intervenes in severe perinatal mood and anxiety disorders before tragedy strikes.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Who is Patrick Clancy?

    Patrick Clancy is the father of the children who were murdered in 2023 and the ex-husband of Lindsay Clancy, who stood trial for the crimes.

    What was Lindsay Clancy tried for?

    Lindsay Clancy was tried for the 2023 murders of her children with Patrick Clancy.

    What has Patrick Clancy said about his children?

    He thinks about them every moment of the day and says their memory will live on in his future children.

  • Patrick Clancy Says He Did His Best During Marriage to Lindsay

    Patrick Clancy Says He Did His Best During Marriage to Lindsay

    Key Highlights

    • Patrick Clancy, ex-husband of Lindsay Clancy, states he did the “best I could” during their marriage.
    • He reveals he lives with the fact that Lindsay killed their three children “every day.”
    • A teaser for his upcoming interview with “60 Minutes” airing Sunday includes his partial statement beginning with “I…”

    Patrick Clancy Speaks Out Ahead of “60 Minutes” Interview

    Patrick Clancy, the former husband of Lindsay Clancy, has broken his silence in a preview for a scheduled Sunday broadcast on “60 Minutes”. In the teaser, Clancy addresses the profound grief and enduring trauma following the deaths of the couple’s three children at the hands of their mother. His decision to participate in a high-profile network interview marks his most extensive public comments since the tragedy.

    Reflections on Marriage and Unimaginable Loss

    According to the released preview, Clancy reflects on his role during the marriage, stating he thinks he did the “best I could”. The phrase, preserved directly from the teaser, underscores a complex retrospective on a relationship that ended in catastrophic violence. He further discloses the relentless nature of his sorrow, explaining that he lives with the fact Lindsay killed their 3 kids “every day.” These direct quotations frame a narrative of a father grappling simultaneously with personal regret and the irreversible reality of his children’s deaths.

    Upcoming Broadcast Details

    The full interview is slated to air on “60 Minutes” this Sunday. The network has released only a brief clip featuring the opening of Clancy’s response, where he begins, “I…” before the teaser cuts away. The ellipsis in the source material indicates the sentence was incomplete in the preview provided to media outlets. The complete context of his statement and the broader discussion with the news magazine program remain pending the broadcast.

    Why This Matters

    The case of Lindsay Clancy drew intense national scrutiny regarding postpartum mental health, the criminal justice system’s handling of maternal filicide, and the support structures available to families in crisis. Patrick Clancy’s public stance—particularly his early advocacy for compassion toward his wife citing severe postpartum psychosis—has been a pivotal element in the public discourse. This interview represents a significant moment where the surviving parent directly addresses the intersection of personal grief, marital dynamics, and the aftermath of a case that sparked legislative and medical conversations about maternal mental health screening and intervention.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When will the Patrick Clancy interview air?

    The interview is scheduled to broadcast this Sunday on the CBS news program “60 Minutes.”

    What direct quotes from Patrick Clancy have been released so far?

    The teaser includes his statements that he did the “best I could” during the marriage and that he lives with the fact Lindsay killed their three children “every day.” It also captures the beginning of a sentence: “I…”

    Who are Lindsay and Patrick Clancy?

    Lindsay Clancy was charged in the deaths of the couple’s three young children in Massachusetts. Patrick Clancy is her ex-husband and the father of the children. He has previously spoken publicly advocating for awareness of postpartum psychosis.

  • Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Breaks Silence on Murder Case Mistrial

    Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Breaks Silence on Murder Case Mistrial

    Key Highlights

    • Juror Michael P. Desronvil has publicly identified himself as the sole holdout in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial deliberations.
    • Desronvil was the only male juror on the panel and his stance prevented a unanimous verdict in the high-profile case.
    • The juror is now sharing his perspective on the deliberation process, offering rare insight into the jury’s internal dynamics.

    Holdout Juror Steps Forward in Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial

    Michael P. Desronvil, the juror who prevented a unanimous verdict in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, has come forward to share his account of the deliberations. Desronvil identified himself as the only male juror on the panel and the lone holdout whose position resulted in a hung jury. His decision to speak publicly provides an uncommon window into the jury room dynamics of a case that has drawn intense national attention since Clancy, a Massachusetts mother, was accused of killing her three young children in January 2023.

    Deliberation Dynamics and the Lone Dissent

    According to Desronvil, the jury’s discussions were extensive and emotionally charged, reflecting the gravity of the charges and the complex psychiatric evidence presented during trial. As the sole male juror and the only holdout, he described facing significant pressure from fellow jurors to change his position. The deliberations reportedly centered on the interpretation of Clancy’s mental state at the time of the killings, with the defense arguing she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis that rendered her not criminally responsible.

    Psychiatric Evidence Central to Juror’s Position

    Desronvil indicated that his stance was heavily influenced by the psychiatric testimony regarding postpartum psychosis, a rare but severe condition that can involve delusions, hallucinations, and a complete break from reality. The defense presented expert witnesses who testified that Clancy was experiencing an acute psychotic episode at the time of the incident, while prosecution experts contested the diagnosis and timing. The juror’s refusal to convict suggests he found the defense’s psychiatric evidence compelling enough to create reasonable doubt about Clancy’s criminal responsibility.

    Why This Matters

    The Lindsay Clancy case has become a focal point in the national conversation about postpartum mental health, maternal filicide, and the criminal justice system’s handling of severe perinatal psychiatric disorders. The hung jury underscores the profound difficulty juries face when adjudicating cases where the defendant’s mental state is the central issue and where medical science regarding postpartum psychosis continues to evolve. A retrial is expected, and the prosecution must now decide whether to pursue the same charges or modify their approach. Meanwhile, advocates for maternal mental health reform argue the case highlights systemic failures in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders that can, in extreme cases, lead to tragedy.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What happens next in the Lindsay Clancy case?

    With a hung jury, the prosecution must decide whether to retry Lindsay Clancy on the same charges, pursue a plea agreement, or dismiss the case. A retrial is the most likely outcome given the severity of the charges.

    Why was Michael P. Desronvil the only holdout?

    Desronvil has indicated his position was based on the psychiatric evidence regarding postpartum psychosis. As the sole male juror, his perspective may have differed from other jurors in evaluating the expert testimony about Clancy’s mental state.

    What is postpartum psychosis and how does it relate to this case?

    Postpartum psychosis is a rare but severe psychiatric emergency occurring in approximately 1-2 per 1,000 deliveries, characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking. The defense argued Clancy was experiencing this condition at the time of the killings, which if accepted, could support a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.

  • Nancy Mace Calls for Public Execution of Lindsay Clancy on ‘The Low Down’

    Nancy Mace Calls for Public Execution of Lindsay Clancy on ‘The Low Down’

    Rep. Nancy Mace has called for the public execution of Lindsay Clancy, stating that anyone who kills their children deserves to meet the same fate. The South Carolina Republican made the remarks during the latest edition of “The Low Down,” a new YouTube collaboration between TMZ and the New York Post.

    Mace’s comments reference the high-profile case involving Clancy, a Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three young children in January 2023. The case has drawn national attention to issues of postpartum mental health and the criminal justice system’s handling of such tragedies.

    The congresswoman’s statement represents an escalation in political rhetoric surrounding the case. While Clancy faces murder charges, her defense team has argued she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis at the time of the killings, a condition that can cause hallucinations, delusions, and a break from reality.

    “The Low Down” marks a new venture for TMZ, expanding its digital footprint through partnership with the New York Post. The show aims to deliver celebrity and political news commentary in a format tailored for YouTube’s audience.

    Mace, known for her conservative positions and frequent media appearances, has not elaborated on whether her comments reflect a formal policy proposal or personal opinion. The remarks have sparked debate across social media platforms regarding the death penalty, mental health defenses in criminal cases, and the role of elected officials in commenting on ongoing legal proceedings.

  • Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Silence on Mistrial in Murder Case

    Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Silence on Mistrial in Murder Case

    Three Jurors Break Silence on Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial Deliberations

    Three jurors who decided the fate of Lindsay Clancy are publicly detailing what occurred inside the deliberation room, offering rare insight into the high-profile Massachusetts murder case. The jurors—identified as Roni Carlson, a fifth-grade special needs teacher; Kellie Farina; and a third juror—are sharing their perspective on the proceedings that led to Clancy’s conviction.

    Jurors Offer Unprecedented Look at Deliberation Process

    In a move that breaks from typical post-trial silence, the trio has stepped forward to explain how they reached their verdict. Their accounts provide a window into the jury’s evaluation of evidence, testimony, and the complex legal questions surrounding the case, which drew national attention due to its tragic circumstances and mental health dimensions.

    Key Details Emerge From Jury Room Discussions

    According to the jurors, deliberations involved careful review of expert testimony, medical records, and the sequence of events leading to the deaths of Clancy’s three children. They described grappling with the intersection of postpartum psychosis and legal responsibility, weighing psychiatric evidence against the prosecution’s arguments regarding premeditation and intent.

    Case Background and Verdict Context

    Lindsay Clancy was charged in connection with the January 2023 deaths of her three young children—Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months—in their Duxbury, Massachusetts home. The case ignited widespread debate about maternal mental health, postpartum psychosis, and the criminal justice system’s handling of severe psychiatric illness. Clancy’s defense centered on her diagnosed postpartum psychosis, while prosecutors argued she planned the killings.

    The jurors’ decision to speak publicly adds a new dimension to the ongoing national conversation about how courts address crimes committed during acute psychotic episodes. Their firsthand accounts may influence future legal approaches to similar cases and public understanding of postpartum mental health crises.

  • Lindsay Clancy ‘Scared’ and ‘Nervous’ Amid Jury Deliberations

    Lindsay Clancy ‘Scared’ and ‘Nervous’ Amid Jury Deliberations

    Lindsay Clancy is “scared” and “nervous” as the jury deliberates her case, according to her attorney, Kevin Reddington. Speaking on Thursday as jurors began their first day of deliberations, Reddington described his client’s anxious state but emphasized that he remains optimistic about the outcome.

    Attorney Describes Client’s State During Deliberations

    Reddington provided the update to reporters outside the courthouse, noting that the start of jury deliberations marks a critical phase in the high-profile proceedings. While Clancy awaits the verdict, her legal team continues to express confidence in their defense strategy.

    The case has drawn significant public attention since Clancy was charged in connection with the deaths of her three children in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Her defense has centered on severe postpartum mental health struggles, including allegations of postpartum psychosis and the effects of prescribed medication.

    Jury Begins Weighing Evidence

    Jurors received their instructions earlier Thursday before retiring to the deliberation room. The panel must reach a unanimous verdict on multiple charges, which include murder and strangulation counts. Legal observers note that deliberations in complex cases involving mental health defenses can extend over several days.

    Reddington’s public remarks reflect a defense strategy that has consistently highlighted Clancy’s documented psychiatric history and the systemic failures her team argues contributed to the tragedy. The prosecution, meanwhile, has maintained that Clancy acted with intent and premeditation.

    As deliberations continue, both the defense and prosecution teams remain on standby at the courthouse, awaiting the jury’s decision.

  • Defense Attorney Reddington Seeks Pardon for Clancy

    Defense Attorney Reddington Seeks Pardon for Clancy

    Defense Attorney Kevin Reddington Asks President Trump to Pardon Lindsay Clancy After Mistrial

    NEEDHAM, Mass. — Defense attorney Kevin Reddington called on President Donald Trump to pardon his client, Lindsay Clancy, during a Tuesday morning appearance on “Good Morning America.” The request comes after a mistrial was declared last week in the high-profile Massachusetts murder case.

    Attorney Makes Direct Appeal to President Trump

    Reddington, a 75-year-old Brockton-based attorney who gained national attention for his fiery defense during Clancy’s murder trial, spoke candidly about the next steps in the case.

    “I’d like to say that perhaps Donald Trump, who felt compelled to speak out about this case, may very well… Mr. President, I would hope that you would consider this young lady, the type of person she is, what she has been through, and consider a pardon,” Reddington said.

    Trump Previously Commented on Case

    When asked about the case on Friday, Trump described it as a “horrible tragedy.”

    “It’s a terrible situation. Look, she did a horrible, horrible thing. It can’t be worse. But, we will find out what the price to pay is. There will be a price. It’s going to be mental institution or jail or something,” Trump said.

    Mistrial Declared After Jury Deadlock

    Clancy is accused of strangling her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in 2023. She did not dispute causing their deaths, but Reddington argued she should not be found criminally responsible due to postpartum psychosis at the time.

    The jury deliberated for seven days before reporting a deadlock at 11-1, with a single holdout juror refusing to acquit. Judge William Sullivan ultimately declared a mistrial after the jury reported deadlock multiple times.

    Reddington said he respects the juror’s right to hold out but believes the juror did not follow the law as instructed.

    “(The juror) had agreed, according to the note from the forelady, that he had doubt but he would not apply the law of reasonable doubt as presented by the judge. That is not right,” Reddington said.

    Reddington made a last-minute motion to the Supreme Judicial Court to replace the holdout juror, but the motion was denied.

    Prosecutor Has Not Announced Retrial Plans

    Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz has not indicated whether he plans to retry the case. Reddington expressed hope they can avoid another trial.

    “I hope, however, after sitting through this trial and seeing the evidence that was presented from the government, as well as from the defense, that he would revisit that issue and hopefully would be willing to work something out that would be acceptable to both sides,” Reddington said.

    Reddington Criticizes Prosecution

    Last week, Reddington lashed out at Cruz for pursuing the murder case.

    “Cruz knows that he was crushed; he doesn’t have a case, he doesn’t have to stand here and say that he’s advocating on behalf of the victims and then look down to see what their names are,” Reddington said. “I’m representing a woman who is a fantastic, wonderful individual. This woman is so brave… every day she came in this courthouse, stood tall… sat there through seven weeks of a trial where nobody had anything bad to say about her except the two prosecutors and apparently Tim Cruz.”

    Upcoming Court Dates

    Clancy is scheduled to return to court later this month for a status hearing, trial assignment, and a hearing on a rule allowing a judge to review a jury’s verdict. While a timeline remains unclear, Reddington has said he is “ready to go” as early as next week if necessary.

    Attorney Details Family History and Medical Treatment

    Reddington provided background on the family’s circumstances leading up to the tragedy.

    “The bottom line is that this couple, they were a family, and they had the children — Cora, Dawson, Callan — and as a family, they were very, very, very happy. That summer of (2022), they were very happy. It was the top of the world for them and the children, and then she had the postpartum depression that struck at the end of September and into October. And this young lady had the pleasure of being introduced, if you will, to a psychiatrist, who had been practicing as a doctor for a month, who advertised that she was an expert in postpartum, and Lindsay just went to see this doctor, which was the worst thing that she ever could have done because she was then placed on all of these medications,” Reddington said.

    Reddington Prepares for Second Murder Trial

    While facing a potential retrial in the Clancy case, Reddington is also scheduled to begin another murder trial in Western Massachusetts. His client, Kelsie Cote, faces charges including murder, armed assault and battery, and withholding evidence in the Halloween 2022 killing of her grandmother.

    Reddington called Cote a “very nice young lady” and said he is “ready to go on that too.” Cote’s next hearing is scheduled for Sept. 28, one day before Clancy’s next hearing on the other side of the state.

    “Between Lindsay and Kelsie, we’ll get them done,” Reddington said on Friday.

    Notable Past Cases

    Reddington, a member of the Massachusetts Bar since 1975, has a history of high-profile defenses. He represented Dr. Ingolf Tuerk, a urologist convicted of voluntary manslaughter in his wife’s 2020 death. Reddington admitted Tuerk took his wife’s life but argued it was not premeditated and that she struck him first. Tuerk was sentenced in 2025 to 12-16 years at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center, a maximum-security facility in Shirley, Massachusetts.

    In 2012, Reddington represented Catherine Greig in a federal trial connected to her time as a fugitive with former Boston mob boss James “Whitey” Bulger. After Greig was sentenced to eight years, Reddington called Bulger the “love of her life” and said she had no regrets.